Review on Robot vacuum cleaner Roborock S7 RU, white by Adriana Rac ᠌

My account goes like this. After reading a sufficient number of gushing reviews, I decided to purchase this miracle. I worked 37 (!) Hours, yet I was not paid for my time. He accomplished a lot while he was working, including making a map of the flat, raising a rag over the carpets, and wiping the laminate and tiles. This made him happy. I forwarded the reports, and they indicate that it's now complete. After six years of development, the iRobot was, in general, the realization of a lifelong ambition of effortless housework. In point of fact, the service provider declined to honor the promise on the grounds that the vacuum cleaner was already at capacity. However, apart from that, there was no other water present in the vacuum cleaner itself. The photographs were displayed; nevertheless, what the hell can be deduced from them is shown in the attachment. In general, it would appear that he is responsible for carrying the turbine that contains the water. In a nutshell, an unmitigated blow to my expectations. I don't provide advice to anyone, but if you take anything from this, let it be that you should avoid using wet cleaning. The service company offered to fix it for $5,400, but I thought about going to consumer protection or the court instead, but now I'm too lazy to do any of those things and it's a waste of time. In a nutshell, I'm going to sell the Craftsman S7 that has a flooded compressor for 30,000 dollars. It has 37 hours of mileage on it, and it's been in use for three weeks. Suddenly, there are fans. PS And I walk about with the airbot on my hands even though it's dumb and it leaves sticky residue everywhere, but it can be removed. So it goes.