Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Kobylka (S ᠌ photo
1 Level
324 Review
0 Karma

Review on SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32 GB, 1 pc. black by Stanislaw Kobylka (S ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

Recording speeds of up to 15–18 m/s are possible when using the original formatting, with little reliance on USB2 or USB3. Many little files are copied at speeds between 5 and 10 m/s Regardless of cluster size, the ugly, sluggish fat32 and ex fat forms Ntfs formatting is required, and results from 512 bytes to 4 kb are essentially the same (I didn't double-check). I won't comment on durability because I'm just using it for two days, but I will praise the speed: while copying books to PDF and FB2, the write speed is about 15-18 mm, however on little files, the total does not indicate appropriately. While transferring a flash drive via usb2 extension cable from the monitor to andisk in usb3 is, in theory, much faster, in practice, this write speed suits me by 90% based on actual needs when writing a pile of Word, Excel, compressed photographs, and Internet pages. Since the movie is written to a USB flash drive, renamed, and copied to a screw, it may be that the movie is read at a rate of 2 giga at a level of 200 capes. This may be because my screw is combined with a solid-state cache, or it may be because of the idiosyncrasies of the computer's cache. recording is odd percent up to 42–44 2 giga the film is recorded at a pace of 80–90 mys, then it firmly freezes and hangs, then it writes further starting at 5 mys and accelerating multiple times on ntfs, on clusters starting at 512 bytes to 4 kb recording time for 2 gigabytes is around 3 minutes and 10 seconds Apparently, there are controller bugs Overall, I'm happy with everything.

Pros
  • design; second, speed
Cons
  • strangely works