I've used several other Ubiquiti wireless hotspot models and expected more from this one, and even more for the price. It was about 2x more expensive than the Lites I currently use. I've been using FlexHD for a while. It should have better coverage than the Lite, but it doesn't. It uses the same channel and position as the Lite it replaced and reports a lot of interference. I get no response from Ubiquiti. According to support forum members, it looks like Nano is having the same issue. And so far no firmware update has included a fix for this from Ubiquiti. While Ubiquiti says the Felx HD should have better coverage than the UFO-style Lite, I don't think so. Is it because it's actually reporting a real problem, is it causing more interference for some reason? inside but my cover is just as good, and it fits better in the position where I oddly had to hang the Lite UFO. so it stays.
Wi-Fi signal amplifier (repeater) TP-LINK TL-WA860RE, white
21 Review
📶 High-Performance MikroTik hAP Mini RB931-2nD: Small 2GHz Wireless Access Point, 3x 10/100 Ethernet Ports, 650MHz CPU & RouterOS
24 Review
MikroTik Dual-Concurrent Access Point: hAP ac Lite RB952Ui-5ac2nD-US
79 Review
Mikrotik RouterBOARD 951Ui-2HnD RB951Ui-2HnD: High-Power 2.4Ghz Wireless AP with 5x10/100 Ports and OSL4
73 Review
🌐 StarTech.com NETRS2321P: 1-Port RS232 to Ethernet IP Converter, Serial over IP Device Server - Black
5 Review
UGREEN USB 3.0 Ethernet Adapter Hub with RJ45: Fast Gigabit Ethernet Converter, 3 Ports USB 3.0 Hub Compatible for MacBook, iMac, Surface Pro, Chromebook, Laptop, PC
11 Review
🔌 Juiced Systems Silver BizHUB USB-C Multiport Gigabit HDMI Hub with 3 USB 3.0 Ports, Gigabit Ethernet, 4K HDMI, SD/Micro SD, and USB-C Power Delivery
11 Review
🔌 uni USB C Hub with Ethernet Adapter, 4K HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, and 3 USB 3.0 Ports for MacBook Pro, iPad Pro, XPS
11 Review