Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Anson Chen ᠌ photo
1 Level
108 Review
83 Karma

Review on Experience Precision and Convenience with the Panasonic Cordless Men's Beard Trimmer - ER-GB40-S (Blue) by Anson Chen ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

I only use it as a face/body trimmer. I compare with 3 years of using 2 Brown Cruiser Z60. bought before NG for 1230, although I saw one large chain of electronics stores aching and all 2200. Panas is much quieter than Brown, the body does not vibrate in the hands, there are more length settings. The main differences are that Brown's trimmer is completely covered by the grating of the nozzle - this makes it easier to slide over uneven faces, but reduces the efficiency of hair capture. in Panasonic, the knife is not covered with the plastic of the nozzle, and the back half (after the slot) of the nozzle clings to physical protrusions (for example, a lip). charge. the glass is included, but you need to install the razor in it with a degree of accuracy, because. contacts are located in the middle of the case on the sides. and the glass is the size of a razor itself, and not a small coaster, like the Cruiser. the case resembles the body of an insect with a narrowing downwards - it does not quite anatomically fit in the palm of your hand, but without serious claims. shaving efficiency is quite high, it cuts off hard bristles in almost 1 pass. shaves without irritation In general, the device is very worthy for its price.

Pros
  • price shaving efficiency charge glass included quiet no body vibration number of length adjustments water resistance 2 operating modes - incl. constantly, or with the button pressed
Cons
  • trimmer not interchangeable no charge indicator assembly China housing without rubber inserts the paint will likely peel off soon average quality of plastic (on the nozzle there are obvious signs of plastic shrinkage when cooling) stiff length adjustment wheel the lower part of the case, controversial in terms of convenience nozzle, controversial in terms of convenience (in comments) disputable in size and principle of operation charge glass (in comments)