Review on Wi-Fi router TP-LINK Archer AX20, black by Ada Holf ᠌

When using lan, it calmly gave out the declared 600 megabits from the operator. I connected to the operator through another router, so there was no authorization (a patch cord was inserted into the wan port of the router from the lan port of the operator's router). Speed ​​testing: iphone 11: 1 meter, line of sight, protocol AC: 319/523 megabits 1 load-bearing wall, AC protocol: 291/308 megabits 1 carrier and 1 thin wall, AC protocol: 233/222 megabits 1 meter, line of sight, protocol AX: 351/579 megabits 1 load-bearing wall, AX protocol: 289/395 megabits 1 carrier and 1 thin wall, AX protocol: 251/217 megabits Macbook pro 15 2022: 1 meter, line of sight, protocol AC: 327/512 megabits 1 load-bearing wall, AC protocol: 259/267 megabits 1 carrier and 1 thin wall, AC protocol: 227/134 megabits For comparison, the speed on Huawei WS880 iphone 11: 1 meter, line of sight, protocol AC: 365/432 megabits 1 load-bearing wall, AC protocol: 268/347 megabits 1 carrier and 1 thin wall, AC protocol: 172/229 megabits Macbook pro 15 2022: 1 meter, line of sight, protocol AC: 376/494 megabits 1 load-bearing wall, AC protocol: 285/189 megabits 1 carrier and 1 thin wall, AC protocol: 189/205 megabits I was dissatisfied with the router, since the relatively new standard did not give any increase on this router, compared to the router purchased in 2022. I will return. I don’t see the point in purchasing this router, since there are cheaper analogues (ac) with a higher speed and greater penetration. I didn’t do speed tests in iperf, it wasn’t before, but according to the first tests on the iphone, it showed 250 megabits on AC and 300 megabits on AX (the test was before a PC connected via lan). I did not do tests at a frequency of 2.4, since it is useless due to the pollution of the air.