Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Jnis Kalni ᠌ photo
1 Level
352 Review
0 Karma

Review on Philips OneBlade trimmer QP2520/20, black/salad by Jnis Kalni ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the quality is good, the price is acceptable.

After purchasing it, I did an immediate test on a week's worth of stubble. trimmed (or shorn?) Dry. I was nearly instantly successful in cleaning up my cheeks and lips, but I needed some time to work on my chin. My hair there grows not from left to right but from right to left, and it also loves to grow into the skin, so I had to walk anywhere from five to seven times in the same spot just to get it all out. But in the end, the outcome is virtually identical to what you would get from the machine. Irritation was experienced, albeit to a lesser degree than before with the equipment. I also cut my beard, but there was nothing magical about it; the results were about the same as they would have been from a regular typewriter (albeit a regular typewriter is much heavier). Everyone seems to have shaved their head. They flew into the mouth as well as the eyes and nose. To summarize, you should give shaving with gel a shot. This is possible because to the design of the razor. Addition. Wet shave. This non-razor has to crawl a little longer in one area since it skips hairs, in contrast to a normal machine, which only needs to be passed one or two times to complete the task. If the machine instantly removes the gel or foam after swiping it, then this non-razor will leave a jumble of hairs and foam, making it unclear whether or not they have been shaved. To reiterate, you are required to do it multiple times. The number of passes that are made during shaving determines the final result. Additionally, there was a subtle distinction: the neck had a number of slashes on it! Either I have such a crooked neck, such crooked hands, or such an unshaven face. One or the other. The incisions are very minor, and the blood flow was nearly nonexistent, but "the sediment remained." On the dry earth, there was none of such nonsense. In general, I will keep making use of it and becoming accustomed to it because, despite its flaws, I still prefer it over the machine.

Pros
  • The first is that it executes the functions that have been declared. See comment. The second consideration is the cost. At first look, it appears that the machine will be more affordable; however, even the most affordable set of four blades for the Mac3 costs $800; while this is plenty for the same period of time (four months), you cannot use them to trim your beard! And now, in exchange for registering a product, they offer a discount of fifty percent on blades—in other words, a present! Additionally, until the month of August, a promotion will be going on in which it will be able to win three additional blades. The final consideration is weight. This one is practically weightless as compared to other machines (especially when it's being charged).
Cons
  • Dealing with hair that grows in a manner that is not typical is challenging. The head can move along just one axis at a time. When connected to the charger, functionality is impaired. This has more to do with marketing, but if the base model had a nozzle that could accommodate bristles measuring 5 millimeters, I would buy it. In addition, quite a number different stores offer it for sale.