s Transfer Speed by Stanislaw Siwak ᠌

Name: Titan Gray Samsung BAR Plus 256GB USB 3.1 Flash Drive (MUF-256BE4/AM) with Up to 400MB/s Transfer Speed
Item: Titan Gray Samsung BAR Plus 256GB USB 3.1 Flash Drive (MUF-256BE4/AM) with Up to 400MB/s Transfer Speed
Rating: 4

May 29, 2023

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

In general, I believe that ninety percent of individuals will be pleased.

If we compare the 128 version's attributes to those of the other flash drives that I took (quick, low-cost ones for 32 and 16), then the 128 version has superior characteristics. However, more expensive does not necessarily equate to better. I would advise you to purchase it if the price isn't a concern for you, if the appearance of scratches doesn't bother you, if it's not difficult for you to get the strap yourself, and if it's not difficult for you to get the strap, and if you are too lazy to hunt for standard flash drives among cheap ones. If some of this is missing, then I really don't know what to say other than "I don't know." The most important thing is to avoid using flash drives with a faux 3.0 or 3.1 rating; otherwise, there are good speeds available even for 300.

Pros

When it comes to small-block recording, this flash drive has been shown to be the quickest of all those that have been tested (it can write 110 files per second). Linear readings suggest a speed of 300 meters per second is being claimed. A little chunk of metal in its entirety

Cons

There are scratches on the flash drive where it was previously inserted into the port and then removed. Do not take a color that is dark; perhaps a color that is lighter will work better with it. It's possible that the strap is not included. Recording at a linear speed of 40 meters per second is possible with the 128GB version. The indicator is for a new generation of flash drives, but I won't suggest that it's worse for inexpensive ones because of this (30 meters for a successful flash drive that costs 290 rubles, and 18 meters per second for a not very good one that costs 450 rubles). I was hoping for stronger small-block recording capabilities for the price, but the fact that it can write 110 files per second is 20-50 times more than the generation of flash drives that came before it, so most people should be fine with it. Unpleasantly surprising was the small-block reading speed, which averaged roughly 300 files per second (whereas the other two cheaper models tested had 500 and 1000 respectively). However, this is a little issue that, in all honesty, does not matter, and a score of more than 100 is acceptable.