Review on CASIO G-Shock Wrist Watch by Ingrid Tomanov ᠌

Name: CASIO G-Shock Wrist Watch
Item: CASIO G-Shock Wrist Watch
Rating: 4

July 17, 2023

I am satisfied, the product fully corresponds to the description.

. When compared to the W-800 (they look and perform similarly, but the 800 lacks a timer), the battery life is only two years, rather than ten. There is a 2.5 increase in price from the comparable amount of 800. Believe me when I say that WR-20220m are unnecessary. The buttons are a bit larger and easier to press than elsewhere. Disadvantages No timer, 800 plastic glass (flush), and uneven backlight on the screen. The verdict, in my opinion, is a resounding "W800"; purchasing one is money well spent.

Pros

Features include as shock absorption, scratch-free glass, a timer, and pinpoint accuracy. Comfortable, even lighting.

Cons

In contrast, the W-800 model is: The display is a little grainy and the battery is two years old. I didn't realize that pressing the buttons would be so inconvenient (how am I supposed to work with a stopwatch?). Like many watches of its kind, this one will eventually wear out its strap. When compared to many of the company's other models, these are surprisingly slow (perhaps due to random chance, but I checked for two copies before writing this review). These wristwatches are designed for high-risk athletes.