Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy S9+ G9650 64GB Unlocked GSM 4G LTE Phone with Dual 12MP Camera in Lilac Purple by Petar Velichkov ᠌

I would rate the phone not awful, if not for the disgusting aesthetic faults (which Samsung does not recognize). First phone, brand new from a conventional retailer. In the crevices and creases between the display and the housing, dust accumulates perfectly. It is only seen inside, and not in public. At night, it stands out because light streams in from all sides (especially the corners). Above the front camera and at all . To Samsung, this is just another "technological feature" that proves unions are obsolete. The problem with many devices of the S series starting from the 8th (search for w3bsit3-dns. Com). I went into two different stores and looked at all of the nines, eights, and laptops displayed in the windows. Flagship Is it A-Brand or not? I'm not completely clueless when it comes to technology, so I do realize that the asking price is excessive. Nonetheless, I shop in a different way, with my eyes and hands. The product itself must appeal to me. Excellent build quality, long life, attractive appearance, and sizeable display. Nothing about cameras, nanometer technology, or any of that interests me. Please provide me with an aesthetically pleasing and functional item. Overly ambitious first demands for $1,000? Samsung operates under such a guiding idea. Do something nice (it would seem), cross out with one enormous jamb and not disclose issues.