Review on Headphones AKG K 52, black by Wiktor Krel ᠌

I pulled myself back up by reading what I had written about the drawbacks, which included the price of these headphones. Obviously, the only headphones that have a legitimate reason to consider this a significant downside are those that cost many times more. Both in terms of appearance and performance, these headphones offer a lot of value for the money. They sound and look great. Various advantages: CONVENIENCE. They are close together, but not uncomfortable. It is possible to use the shackle that adjusts itself. At first, there was some discomfort caused by an uncomfortably tight fit, but after some time, either the headphones broke in, or I became accustomed to the feeling. It's an excellent idea to soundproof. Lightweight in nature. The cable provides the image of being trustworthy and well-sealed, but only time will tell if this is indeed the case. SOUND. Full, "meaty," and aggressive are some adjectives that come to mind when I think of the sound. The bass is extremely loud, yet it is distinct from the rest of the sound and does not mumble. Clarity may be heard in the vocals. The stereo effect is not terrible, and there is no sensation of sound localisation occurring inside the head. Even while listening on portable devices, there is plenty of headroom left over for volume adjustments. It would appear that rock is the "native element" that these headphones are made of. A variety of drawbacks: CONVENIENCE. The wire is fairly rigid and has a predilection for kinking. When moving about while listening to music, it is possible to accidentally pull the plug out of the player's socket, which results in a crackling sound. SOUND. There is a lack of transparency and airiness in the mids and highs, but I get the impression that this is generally characteristic of closed-type headphones. While listening to more intricate styles, such as symphonic rock or classical opera, the headphones are unable to "pull" the sound as well, and the result is a muffled effect.