Review on 🔊 Edifier R2000DB Studio Monitors: Powered Bluetooth Bookshelf Speakers with Optical Input, 120 Watts RMS - Black by Adisorn Wichit ᠌

Let's dot all the "i" I'm not an audiophile, but I do have ears. Subjective IMHO + I will compare with r1700bt He did not grieve with the 1700s. But modern TV (mine) has only an optical output. Do not connect, but bt, as it seemed to me, when connected from a computer-> tv + speakers, it began to sin. I didn’t want to be smart through the ADC (optics-> bell), I think it’s time to “upgrade” the sound to modern standards, and at the same time improve the quality. Well, that's what I thought. It is logical that the r2022bt should be more interesting in everything than its younger 1700. But, as it turned out, this is a very controversial issue. 1700: + better, crisper highs + middle, definitely brighter + bass, adjustable the way you want! - there are no exits, except for bells and t (this is not an exit, but an exit)) 2022: + more juicy filling of the whole picture + bass bass bass + bass bass + bass bass bass bass. In short, because of the obvious bias in this very thing, everything else is built from it. And you will not be able to remove them so that they do not crawl out everywhere. I have a twist on the bottom, but this is clearly not enough :-( I really want to cut them off, by default (not through equiv, because you can’t turn on equiv in TV) And now you understand what a thing is: they both sound good, but they do it for your listener. If you are a bass lover and everything that is connected with it and suggests in sound, then 2022 is your choice. If more pronounced highs/mids + human adjustment of basses for yourself is more important to you, then 1700 (or similar) is definitely yours! * so I don’t really care for basses, and I don’t understand why the adjustment in 2022 was cut off like that, but until now (a week later) I can’t decide who to leave permanently. Because the sound of 2022, even with my dislike for bass, is still tastier. Ambush.