Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Agata wistowska ᠌ photo
1 Level
159 Review
0 Karma

Review on WaterPik WP-660 Aquarius Professional, white by Agata wistowska ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The product is definitely not worth the nerve, better not take it.

Sadly, this is representative of the quality of many things manufactured in China. Plastic disposable g. however, as someone correctly described waterpik products earlier on in the reviews: ( Has some pros In general, using an oral irrigator is a very good idea because it assists in keeping the gums and teeth in good health. And if it weren't for the intricacies, there wouldn't be any legitimate criticisms leveled against this paradigm. Many disadvantages: The biggest disadvantage is that the product's quality is poor, and every single one of the devices eventually stops working. The only thing left to wonder is whether or not this will take place before or after the warranty has run out. Because ARCOM (the provider) does not repair the irrigator, the buyer suffers a total loss of both the irrigator and the money in the second scenario. They do not offer any service, do not have any specialists, and do not have any components. It is absurd in general considering the warranty period is only two years (instead of five) and the hefty cost of the devices.

Similar reviews