Review on SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch Active2 (Aqua Black, R820-44mm) 📱 with Bluetooth, Silicon Strap, and Aluminum Bezel - International by Seunghyun Nahm ᠌

When I made the move to Android, I decided to get this watch. I had been using the Apple Watch S3 before to it. I was glad to see that there is a vast selection of personalized watch faces available on the market; one can almost always find something that suits their preferences. A significant number of additional workouts in comparison to what is available on the Apple Watch. The Apple Watch's battery life remains unchanged at two days regardless of whether or not the AoD feature is engaged. Oddly enough, Samsung is better at measuring activity than Apple Watch, which lies horribly about the distance traveled even after it has been calibrated. Samsung's devices are more accurate. On the other hand, Samsung falls short in a few key respects that become readily apparent in comparison to Apple Watch. The vibration isn't that great, especially when the AW's Taptic Engine was installed. While using auto-brightness, you have to remove the watch from its hiding place under the sleeve of the jacket and then wait an additional second until the sensor puffs up and sets the proper level of brightness. Because the gesture to activate the screen does not work very well, while you are running on a treadmill and want to check your pulse, you lift your wrist, but nothing happens. You give it another shot, this time a little more methodically, and the screen eventually lights up. There are many different workouts, but the screen of one that is already running was designed by someone who has never really done one of those workouts. Why are the calories displayed on the first panel, while the pulse is displayed on the second? This results in the requirement that you navigate through the various screens. All of this takes place as you are sprinting around the track. It would be helpful to have the opportunity to personalize these screens. Because the tablet that does the wireless charging has a very feeble magnet, the watch can very easily lose touch with the charger. Autonomy, despite the fact that it is superior to my earlier Apple Watch, is still lacking in comparison to the number of stars that can be seen in the sky, and my everyday Galaxy Watch has a longer lifespan. Yet the Active has a far more appealing appearance to me in terms of its design. In spite of all of the aforementioned drawbacks, I am entirely content with the watch because, in my opinion, it is the superior choice for those who use Android. Because the functionality of the Galaxy Watch Active for iOS is severely limited, I do not suggest that iPhone users purchase this watch. Instead, I believe that iPhone users would benefit more from purchasing an Apple Watch.