Review on Polar Vantage M Smart Watch, Black by Aashiva Pal ᠌

I use 2 weeks. I took the old Polar M400 instead, which honestly served 3 years and never failed. I doubted the accuracy of the heart rate monitor, but really wanted to get away from the chest. The latest firmware about a week ago solved for me the problem with measuring the pulse during tempo workouts (once the pulse dropped from 174 to 160-150 without reducing the load and did not rise). 1. Now several workouts at a high heart rate give a very clear picture of the pulse (subjectively, even better than a chest strap - a smooth line without drawdowns). 2. The screen is very visible in the sun. Lighting on the street is practically not needed. The room is convenient, something that turns on automatically when you check the time. 3. Batteries with daily training (50-90 minutes) and with a constant measurement of the pulse are exactly enough for 4-5 days. Charging to 100% takes up to 2 hours. 4. GPS is subjectively better than on the M400. Does not lose and does not buggy. Quickly finds in a new place (up to 1 min). 5. Sync with Android phone without crash. On the M400, when another device was connected to the phone via BT, it was buggy. 6. Vibro alarm for 2 weeks has never failed. Very comfortably.