Review on Apple iPod touch 6 by Adam Domaski ᠌

Name: Apple iPod touch 6
Item: Apple iPod touch 6
Rating: 5

July 04, 2023

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

Initially, I took it to listen to music through deezer.
But iOS captivated with its speed and thoughtfulness.
I seriously thought about taking the iPhone as my next smartphone.

PS: The camera is pretty good for a player.
Icompared it with the Sony Xperia V smartphone and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30compact camera - I took several shots for each device with the same subject, in low natural light, then chose the sharpest file for each device. And while the Sony TX 30's camera is technically superior to the iPod's, subjectively, the iPod shot was the sharpest, and perhaps that's why the most enjoyable.

I posted these three pictures forcomparison - 
Write here in the discussion or there in the album in thecomments - the picture taken by which device, in your opinion, is the best?

PSS: Pretty good in its classcomplete headphones (plug-in plugs).Compared with Yuin pk3 on the classics directly from the iPod. I liked the sound of thecomplete ones more (I write in the "comment", because the place in the "dignity" field is over).

Pros

1. One of the few players that can listen to streaming services like deezer (requires iOS or Android). The sound here is better than on typical smartphones, and at least quite decent for a player. "Swings" high-impedance headphones (for example, Beyerdynamic dt250 250 Ω) Competing players on Android are 2-3 times more expensive and slow (at least the ones I know). 2. I really like that in iOS programs open very quickly (after opening they are efficiently cached and then open without any visible delays at all - you can instantly switch between them through the home screen). And this is considering that in the iPod, the processor operates at lower frequencies relative to the iPhone (downclocking). For comparison - on my Sony Xperia V (Android 4.1.2) until the desktop opens after the program, then until the program opens . and the open program is cached only until the next program is opened, i. E. You can't quickly switch between programs. And the difference is not only in the cache. Opening another _non-cached_ program on the iPod is also much faster. 3. I also really liked that the display can be yellowed out of the box, and the brightness can be reduced to a comfortable level in the twilight only due to the backlight (the minimum value is 4.9 cd / m²). For comparison, I don’t have enough backlight adjustment on my Sony Xperia V (the minimum value is 23 cd / m²) and I have to adjust the matrix. And those programs for yellowing and lowering the brightness of the matrix that I tried to use on Android constantly crash when I open the browser, so it’s not possible to comfortably surf in the twilight (my favorite lighting); or it turns out, but not for long. There is no such problem with the iPod. And even if the minimum brightness of the backlight on the iPod is a bit lacking, then you can lower the brightness with the matrix using the tools built into the OS (called lowering the white point) - accordingly, nothing conflicts and does not crash.

Cons

1. Could make a normal equalizer, not just presets. You can find a third-party normal equalizer in the app store, but it will only work when playing sound files through this third-party application. 2. There is no LED indicator for notifications (there are on many Android devices). 3. In the default mail client, there is no auto-wrapping of lines when scaling.