Review on Quadcopter DJI Mavic 2 Pro, gray by Yoonki Baek ᠌

It seems that we have forgotten how to be surprised. Trust me, the Mavic 2 Pro is amazing. This device will be relevant for a long time, like the Phantom 4. It is clear that in a year the camera will be removable, there will be a mechanical shutter and 60 frames at 4k, 1200 at FHD. But this will not fundamentally change the level of quality achieved in the Mavic 2. Has some pros I've been waiting for a copter like this for 5 years. Waited and bought without hesitation. This is my first serious video/photo quad so I can only compare it to the photo/camcorders I use. The main advantage of this software is its stable operation. Glitches are extremely rare. A convenient menu with an abundance of settings, everything is logically located, set up quickly. Comparing with the Olympus E-M1II software, every second ate of which crashes with an error and the menu is extremely confusing. Or the Sony DSC-RX100M6, which, after being turned on, can give an error and can only be brought back to life by removing the battery. Believe me, I like these cameras, but their users favorably forgive their obvious shortcomings, and they blame the Mavik for this, although the latter is an order of magnitude more complex both electronically and mechanically. The second Mavic in the Pro version is beautiful with its camera, the inch matrix is ​​less noisy than 4/3 of the Olympus. The zoom is not needed, Mavic can fly, and the doll effect is done in four clicks. Maybe now I’ll write a seditious thought, but the price of Mavic is excellent, it is underestimated in relation to its capabilities compared to competitors. There is no need to compare it with copters, among them it has no competitors in terms of picture quality except for the Phantom. And when compared with cameras. Olympus E-M1I costs 120 thousand, the picture quality of the Mavic is better. Is it possible to find a better picture in a photo-camcorder for less money? Of course yes, but there will be disadvantages. In my opinion, we were given a wonderful tool with great potential for little money. Has some cons I do not think that the existing shortcomings can be considered significant at this price. No one has done better and cheaper. I'm surprised at the number of claims made by others. Yes, the lens has distortion, but it’s easy to fix it, it’s not about fighting noise or aberrations. Yes, no 60 frames at 4k, but who has it? There is no need to remember about Gopro, Sidzheykamy and other action cameras, the quality of their pictures is not comparable. Complain about the short range. But this photo camcorder can fly 2 kilometers stably! I dreamed of a smooth wiring of 100 meters as manna from heaven and for a good shot I forded mountain rivers, and here you can fly without getting your feet wet and without risking your own head and remove the wiring of 100 and 200 meters as smooth as a rail and the price of this equipment is cheaper studio rails! And everything fits in the bag of a small SLR! What is there to talk about? What are the disadvantages?