Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens, black by Anastazja Miller ᠌

I join the opinion that this is the most controversial L from Canon. I understand everything, in '06 it was extremely problematic to make an ideal picture at such aperture, however, in '19 the lens can disappoint. I do not regret the purchase, but for those who are considering it, I recommend considering a number of points: -The concept of a sharp frame for a given lens is relative. You will have to choose between such options as "not soft, but blurry", "sharp, but soft", "sharp, not soft, but strong HA". In connection with the foregoing, the camera's automation is experiencing particular difficulties with focusing, and we are talking here about the top "single-digit" model. On the semi-professional and lower class cameras, as practice has shown, it is better not to install a lens at all, in order to avoid getting 60% of defective frames. -Mirror focus works much worse than mirrorless. I recommend using it in difficult times. -This is the lens in which Dual pixel RAW will perform well with its ability to refocus during processing - the amount of focus point shift, due to the very small depth of field, is sufficient to save or improve a number of frames - The design raises doubts about reliability and durability. It does not creak like 50 / 1.8, but it also does not cause the feeling of a monolith, like many brothers in the class. I advise you to consider that this is a special purpose lens, like a TS-E or MP-E. You are unlikely to be able to make them masterpieces by shooting everything, but by finding your niche, you will be able to take really cool shots that are inaccessible to those who do not have it.