Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
DoYun Hwang ᠌ photo
1 Level
120 Review
73 Karma

Review on Fully Unlocked Samsung Galaxy S10+ (128GB, Prism Black) - Refurbished Edition by DoYun Hwang ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I was deceived! The product does not correspond to the description at all.

To which I ask, why did you send money before the first exams were even taken? Because this was the flagship selling point of the Galaxy S9, it's no surprise that the product bombed in the marketplace due to widespread consumer dissatisfaction with exynos. The new UI shell held out hope that the Koreans would adapt their CPU to the standard, but instead they adopted it and landed themselves in double difficulty. Value depreciation, third. If you wait a month after the device's first availability, you can get it for 58 thousand instead of seventy-eight thousand. Maintaining prices for at least six months provides some indication of the item's worth. Make a purchase for the following year? Indeed, there are zero justifications for purchase, and an infinite number of arguments against it. Four, a notch for a front-facing camera. Many apps have their functionality trimmed off the screen right where the camera is located, making it impossible to use both apps at the same time, for example if the phone is split in half. That is to say, the previous 6.4 diagonal is now somewhere around 6.1. If you need a huge screen without clipping, it's better to get the note 9 instead. For professional reasons, I also took the phone, so mark one down as a negative. No esim in the fifth position. The priciest Android phone that doesn't support esim cards. But why is this required, exactly? In a perfect world, I'd be able to leave 128 with a SIM card, an eSIM, and a flash drive. No matter how cool or handy it sounds, this is neither. The fingerprint scanner behind the screen is gross and doesn't operate properly. It's frustrating when you can't get into your own phone. This time the cost of intelligence is looming over me once more. What the heck, I guess. Is there anything for which I could have opted to pay a higher price? Having lived with the car for two months, I have decided that I will never buy another car. I would never suggest that to a friend. Just up to 35 s10+ thousand will be accepted. To emphasize, I'd like to mention that the identical s9 + a week earlier hung for 34590 for the action. If the offer is that large and includes the possibility of future growth, then you shouldn't turn it down. And they sell them off for that much money, despite the fact that nobody wants them and they sit in the warehouse for months, rendering the money in stores useless. The Galaxy A70 and the Xiaomi Mi9 are two alternatives to think about. While I like the benefits of the galaxy A range in general, I would never have guessed that it was a Samsung product. However even the most slothful consumers had to learn to adapt to survive in today's economy.

Pros
  • It's unfortunate that we have to dive right into the merits, but that's how it goes. That's a nice, juicy screen right here. To my knowledge, however, there is currently nothing on the market that is both cheaper and more amoled. Software update; firmware. Excellent work; it's a joy to put to use. Everything works as it should, the animations aren't any worse than on the iPhone, and the overall experience is polished and natural. To sum up, the firmware on an A70 makes it vastly superior to the identical xiaomi incompetently. And now I found myself wondering that, on average, xiaomi loses a thousand kilometers if you take the galaxy A70 for a promotion. Still, Samsung started competing with the mas brand, and that's significant. Third, how the device rests in the palm of the hand. While the display is identical to that of an iPhone, the newer model is significantly more compact. Strong construction, etc. As a bonus, it takes decent pictures; I really like the "fish eye" appearance the camera's included feature provides; this makes it possible to shoot from a short distance with no fear of missing important details.
Cons
  • This brings me to the meat of my critique. Despite the benefits I listed, I still think the Samsung swallowed it. So that's the deal. 1. Suggested retail prices were just slashed. The price of s10 is exactly two times too costly for the amount of material included in it. Additionally, the business released the Galaxy A series of smartphones a month after the S10 Plus, which are practically identical to the latter (having the same display, cameras, firmware, battery, and so on), but are far less expensive at under $20,000. Use growth-focused promotions. Even at 25, a sweet soul is worth more than 78, right? Namely, what won't be there? Personally, I do not think that the reverse charging was wasted. Computer chip 2. They ride an Exynos chip all the way to 2022, bringing the wonders of the cosmos with them. This proportion is based on data from the previous year and the previous framework. Samsung wants more money, therefore despite the fact that the identical snapdragon 855 is around 30% more powerful, it is not profitable for them to do so, and so they continue to market their inferior product. Have a look at the trials posted on YouTube; you won't hear a peep of competition. If you like, how do you like it? Why advertise smart for $80,000 when you're only going to use hardware that's 25% as powerful as what smart offers? This is a major letdown for me. Consider the same iPhone: Apple has the power to set new price records, but its A9 chip is the most powerful in the world, so you're effectively giving up a lot of money if you don't opt for Android. Then things swing around: the competition is tough, the market can turn 180 degrees every three months, but frankly they use last year's gear in their flagship and announce a record dip in sales while smiling. To what extent does it resemble...? Put what already exists on the market if you can't create a competitive CPU, right? To be honest, I'm at a loss for words. This is the sole reason I got the phone before it was released, and if I hadn't pre-ordered it, I never would have.