Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kenta Ikeda ᠌ photo
1 Level
111 Review
29 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (128GB, 6GB) 6.5-inch 120Hz AMOLED, Snapdragon 865, IP68 Water Resistant, Dual-SIM GSM Unlocked (Global 4G LTE) SM-G780G/DS International Model with Wireless Charger Bundle in Navy by Kenta Ikeda ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but generally not bad.

Total. It's a neat phone. the best offer for the money. Nevertheless, if you frequently use your phone, read books on it, or play games, this phone is not for you. Even if you are not aware of the PWM, your eyes are still being harmed. At the the least, I hope the white balance will be fixed. Oh yes, I did get a new phone as a result of the desktop elements, as well as the crooked ates, that appeared on the old Samsung, not only for me.

Pros
  • Only the S20 FE G780F versions with the Exynos 990 processor are affected by all reviews of overheating, braking, and a weak battery. You may purchase S20 FE G780G for the same price if you study the specifications and inspect the packaging! (described on the box) and a SnapDragon 865 processor, and you'll have a fantastic phone with no issues. I made a nearly trouble-free choice between the iPhone 11 and Sams, and Sams prevailed. Only the camera sticks out, so you need a case. Design 5 points: thin frames, lovely colors, good hand feel. Better than the camera on an apple, 5 points. More background blurring, improved night mode, better sharpness, more zoom, tracking dual pixel focus, 32 megapixel front camera, and 4k 60fps recording are all improvements. Sams C10 has bass, earning stereo sound four points. Moreover, the microphone is superior to the background. The phone was put together well, and I watched the YouTube analysis. Fast and seamless functioning, although there is a significant flaw.
Cons
  • On the monitor, everything appears to be in order. 120 Hz/high resolution. When you pick up your old Samsung Note, A50, or S10 (you have all four on hand), however, the display on even the low-cost A50 is significantly brighter, the colors are richer, the white balance is accurate, and most importantly, the eyes do not grow fatigued. As follows: According to all the tests, all new Samsung devices exhibit PWM, or screen flickering, at a maximum backlight frequency of 250Hz. The more flashing and eye damage there is, the smaller the backlight is. The necessary safe limit is greater than 300 hertz. On the same screens purchased from Samsung, this figure is 400–430 for the Chinese version of Xiaomi, Vanplas. But, quality was sacrificed as usual by Google, Samsung, and Apple, which is utterly aggravating. Yes, Yabloko and Samsung are the top in marketing, but in the end. As a result, my eyes grow tired and my head hurts, which is exactly what is known. Your eyes feel better right away after picking up a different phone. 2) Blue is all over the white balance. Only the "bright colors" mode allows for white balance adjustment; in this mode, you must set the white balance as warm as possible before removing half of the blue from the palette for it to be accurate. There is no white balance adjustment while using the natural color mode. This is an issue. 3) The backlight's brightness is understated, perhaps to conserve battery life in 120 hertz mode. The joke is that 120 Hz is dynamic, not stable, and beneficial for the battery while setting 60 Hz reveals that the display is sharpened at 120 and the lubrication is artificial, making it difficult to read the characters. People from Samsung, how are things going? Why position your screens where Xiaomi, OnePlus, and Realmi show them better? Why do low-cost smartphones use safe, non-flickering display controllers that are standard? Why would I choose to spend more money on a flagship with a subpar screen?