Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 12/128 GB, Dual nano SIM, gray by Boyan Lalov ᠌

Name: Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 12/128 GB, Dual nano SIM, gray
Item: Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 12/128 GB, Dual nano SIM, gray
Rating: 3

July 17, 2023

Not my best purchase, could have found something else.

In general, you become acclimated to the size and height of the work surface because they are both highly useful for working and reading. Additionally, the weight and battery may be adapted, and they typically function well, but considering the issues with the camera, all of this is just dust.
Additionally, I quickly compared the 8+ and 20 Ultra.
It is regrettable that advancement has turned into regression, and it appears that we will now need to choose a different decision. The worst part is that I want to do it right away.

Pros

There is a breadth, but practically all of the images are destroyed by their automatic noise cleaning. The screen is covered with a protective coating when it is purchased, which is much better than any of these guards, which are just a divorce.

Cons

Since all the other differences from the G8 are not significant, I actually got it for the camera alone (I compare it to the Galaxy G8): 1. automatically analyzes all photos (removing noise and likely matrix issues, creating smartblur + sharpness), as a result, the texture vanishes - it can't be turned off. It's undoubtedly advantageous for Korean and other females to have flawless skin, large eyes, and full lips, but the selfie camera is for just that. 2. Even at 12 megapixels, when zooming in more than once. despite claims to the contrary, the zoom turns out to be optical. Additionally, a clever blur and a firm sharpness are placed on top. 3. Even with portraits, focus is nearly never correct. 4. The claimed 108 megapixels are comparable to a maximum of 54, which are subsequently magnified and blurred. This is notably noticeable in landscapes, where everything becomes worms with awful clarity when shooting at 12 megapixels instead of foliage and other details. This result also exists. 5. It's difficult to take macro photos and there are odd light effects, especially in stark contrasts. 6. It is nearly impossible to remove a page with consistent crispness because the corners are blurry. 7. Due to improper HDR, there may occasionally be a halo surrounding things, such as a green tint to the sky. 8. For some reason, there is no possibility to shoot at 108 or wide when in Pro mode. 9. HDR quality control might be included when shooting in Pro mode. Although three or more ates have already been released, nothing has changed since I wrote to the support service, aside from me unsubscribing.