We are talking about a version with 64GB of memory and USB 3.2 (new flash drives come in 3.2. This 3.1 was renamed recently). I've been using it for less than a week, so I can't say anything about reliability. I took it for various tasks, as a Windows installer, for watching videos on TV, and other stuff. For these tasks, this is a great option. I benchmarked CrystalDiskMark 7.0 first in native FAT32 format, the results were ~48MB/s for 1MB sequential read, ~20MB/s for 1MB sequential write, and ~7MB/s for 4KB random read and write. I forgot to make a screenshot. Then I formatted it in exFAT, and then the flash drive revealed itself. I tested with different clusters, the results are the same, so I settled on "4096 bytes". The numbers are stable, you can see this by looking at the screenshots. I donβt know how processor power affects flash drive speed testing in CrystalDiskMark, but if anyone is interested, I already have an old i7 4710HQ mobile processor.
Titan Gray Samsung BAR Plus 256GB USB 3.1 Flash Drive (MUF-256BE4/AM) with Up to 400MB/s Transfer Speed
69 Review
Kingston DataTraveler flash drive 100 G3 256 GB, 1 pc. black
74 Review
Samsung BAR Plus 128GB - High-Speed USB 3.1 Flash Drive Titan Gray (MUF-128BE4/AM)
67 Review
32GB SanDisk USB Flash Drive (SDCZ430-032G-A46)
78 Review
8TB Seagate Backup Plus Hub Desktop Hard Drive with Data Recovery Services
56 Review
18 TB External HDD Western Digital WD Elements Desktop, USB 3.0, black
95 Review
π Seagate Expansion 3TB Portable USB 3.0 External Hard Drive (STEA3000400) in Black
60 Review
2 TB External HDD ADATA DashDrive Durable HD650, USB 3.2 Gen 1, Blue
55 Review