Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 36
  • 5
    29
  • 4
    5
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

It's been a few years since I've owned it. Members of the Zbrush (3D sculpting software) team have reported issues with the way the program interacts with some apps (sculptris). According to these reports, the program freezes and acts even more poorly than Intel. I took it with me when I made the transition from amd fx-reports to this one, so there will be no remarks on the problem; nonetheless, there are rumors; however, you should hold on there. Although it performs quite well when rendered…

Pros
  • At the beginning of sales, the total power was better than that of an Intel i7 for 24 thousand dollars. Now, and even more so, Pulling the Witcher 3 ultra off of a branded cooler, which has good heat dissipation.
Cons
  • The branded cooler in the keyshot (3D render) was not able to handle the 100% load of the cores, and as a result, the processor started to choke. Made the decision to purchase a standard cooler. It will not be able to compete with the solution that Intel has developed for a single core. Notwithstanding what you may have heard, not all software is optimized (see below).

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

Do not hold out hope for a miracle; the CPU is not even as good as the previous-generation i7. Playing games, doing bookkeeping, and using the Internet are just a few examples of the many modern uses. The benefits: Extremely chilly for an AMD! A tiny, silent, and space-saving cooler will do. Does a fantastic job on most things. Stable. A revolutionary architecture that fully utilizes DDR4 memory. Synthetic testing and many other applications work like a charm. Ill effects: Despite its…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

Radeon R9 290x performs as expected when paired with the MSI Gaming Pro Carbon x370 and the Corsair CMD16GX4M2B3200C16. At ultra settings in GTA V, we saw under 90 FPS. The i7-7700k is the best processor for gaming and is also a good choice if you frequently switch between many applications. The benefits: Count them: 16. It looks like a socket AM4 + is the right size, and I'm done here. For use in video games. the negatives: Nowadays, games, for instance, typically only require 8 threads, so…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

In terms of gaming, AMD is more even, without jumps or microfreezes, while Intel dances up and down. In my perspective, this balances out the lower average frame rate. The 7700k has no chance in anything else, both in terms of pure performance and the price of a processor, motherboard, and cooler kit. In other words, the R7 Ryzen processor acts like two quad-cores with eight threads each because it is intended as two CCXs. A 22 GB/s communication backbone called Infinity Fabric connects these…

Pros
  • 8c16t, Outstanding multi-threaded performance comparable to the i7-6900k (RUB 75,000) ratio of cost to performance, All Zen-based processors will share a single socket, and active support is guaranteed for at least four years. It will almost surely overclock to 3.7 GHz on the stock cooler (which is RGB!1), and with any hope, up to 4-4.1 GHz and temperatures of up to 70 degrees. Excellent voltage drop potential: at stock frequencies, less than 1 volt. The processor operates more quickly the higher the RAM frequency, which is closely related to Infinity Fabric. Compared to the popular kaby lake, there are virtually no microfreezes and a significantly higher minimum FPS in games. AMD FineWine™.
Cons
  • Currently, it is difficult to run RAM at a frequency higher than 2666 MHz because most boards forbid it, or you must manually experiment with timings and frequencies until you find one that works. Only 2933 MHz pulls, not 3000. It is anticipated that a remedy will be made soon. Yes, Ryzen IPC is roughly 8-10% lower than Kaby Lake in games that run at 5-8% fewer frames per second than 7700k. CCX. There is a significant delay and, as a result, a performance decrease of up to 25% when the cores must communicate between two CCXs as opposed to one CCX. look at remark. The price in 2022 constitutes a financial crime.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

I downgraded from a 3770K to a 1700 (also without overclocking), and the performance boost in synerender was noticeable. The results indicated a multiplier of 2.2. For some reason, just a portion of the grass on one core counts when calculating the multiplier for a real-world scenario (3 times). But it's still a huge deal! Concurrently, we purchased a 7700 for use in the workplace; I did not test the claim that the render is 1.6 times weaker on the real stage, but it was the case on the bench.

Pros
  • The i7 was perfect for rendering and didn't move for hours. However, Intel's 8 cores come at a hefty price. Reviews have shown that it is simple to pursue, and that the multiplier can now be used.
Cons
  • There are one-line tasks, albeit there aren't many where I'll notice a difference, so I believe it would be excellent to overclock.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

I snagged it from the pilot episode when it originally premiered. Overheating from an excessive initial setting was the first sign of trouble. When I disabled overclocking, the issues went away. Everything is OK after leaving it at 1. Overclocking doesn't make sense in most cases. Nonetheless, I'm determined to extract as much as possible, so I endured. While I wait a while and make my way to the new series, my mind is already on the 3950s.

Pros
  • - Threads - Frequency - Performance of the TOP box
Cons
  • Optimization for lameness and dissipation of heat

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

My computer never makes a sound. At work. While you are playing. When idle. There were no changes in temperature. Power by a wide margin for a considerable number of years. Windows does not have any bugs. Bios was quickly updated to the most recent version, and there have been no issues. Why would somebody purchase a system that has a 7700k monitor yet only has a 60Hz refresh rate? The assertion that Ryzen is not a suitable processor for gaming? In all likelihood, players in this situation will

Pros
  • Owner of a Ryzen 7 1700 who is Overjoyed Pros: 1) Are you one heck of a multitasker and can you launch the tank client? the client that came in second for tanks? And it's not too uncomfortable to play multiple games at once in GTA 5, right? Easily! (no, I don't do that, but I know that Hong Kong is capable of running a large number of games, apps, or virtual machines at the same time - checked) 2) Simple overclocking from within Windows (using AMD Ryzen Master), all the way up to 3.6 GHz, WITHOUT having to increase the voltage on the packaged cooler. Even a blonde will do. 3) It is even chillier within the uncomplicated core of my computer than it was before! It is challenging to bring the temperature up from 60 degrees (33 degrees Celsius) in a blown case. - in terms of stock frequency 4) has a significant advantage over the i7-5960x in both the single-thread and the multi-thread benchmarks of CPU-Z. 5) We did not experience any slowdowns or freezes when playing the games.
Cons
  • I was not able to quickly impact the pricing strategy of a competition, which was one of our top priorities.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, Im glad I found this product.

The processor does not have a competitor in terms of the price-to-performance ratio (with the possible exception of the R5 1600). The bundled cooler exceeded my expectations in terms of how quickly it cooled things down, therefore my satisfaction with it was quite high. Even if Vishera previously came with boxed coolers, the difference between them and the new Wraith is night and day. The new Wraith is not only efficient, but it also does not generate noise, which was the old coolers' greatest…

Pros
  • 1) Performance; 2) Cost; 3) Efficient use of heat; 4) Comprehensive package; 5) Soldering between the heat-distributing cover and the die
Cons
  • It will work, but by default it will start at 2133 MHz, and the performance of this CPU significantly depends on the speed of the memory; it follows from the first point, but even so, dry performance per core is lower than that of a competitor. It is true that if both devices use the same frequency, the difference will be cancelled out; however, no one will knowingly lower the frequency of either the 7700 or the 8700 to 3.7-3.9 GHz.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch and I recommend the product for purchase.

Great processor, with 8 cores and 16 threads in total. A duty for the time to come. Overclocked without any issues to 3700 GHz, someone will remark that it's about nothing at all because it's about nothing at that speed. Nothing, that's it exactly. However, when applied to a boxed cooler, with a voltage drop to 12022 and a maximum temperature in loads between 72 and 75 degrees, this is not a terrible result. The overall performance is increased by around thirty percent when the memory clock is…

Pros
  • A low price for an 8-core processor that can catch up to the top 1800X when it is overclocked. Overclocking and voltage reduction are both possible with this setup. A quality box chiller. Excellent performance.
Cons
  • There is not one single one of them.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall pretty good, an equal number of pros and cons.

Powerful new AMD graphics processing unit. I like amd, but that was an unacceptable percentage. Any i7 below the 2600k range should be exchanged for a dorma. When the proportion is no longer important, in another five years, all sixteen threads will function normally. Only AMD fanatics should consider buying this, or else wait until the price reduces to $10–$15. There will be almost no improvement in games if you make the transfer from Evie and Sandy Bridge, and in some places it will get…

Pros
  • Refinement, simulation, and artificiality. Synthetic performance leader between the i7 6800k and the i7 6900k benchmarks. The 1800x costs significantly less than the previous model but performs identically. Put solder in the cavity beneath the cover.
Cons
  • Poor performance for gaming, falling between the old i7 and the new i5 in terms of performance. Look at mothers on socket 2022 v3 for a comparison; they're 25k for the non-gaming percentage and quite weak (8-20 oblique). I don't expect it to be refined very soon; there are still compatibility issues with Windows 10 and performance issues with high-frequency RAM.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I paid 1920220 for my 1700 BOX, which turned out to be less expensive than 7700K but a little more expensive than a standard 7700 (which, in addition, is unable to chase). Because the standard cooler is already of sufficient quality and noise level, purchasing an OEM is a criminal act. As a consequence of this, I put together a mother system with a capacity of 16 gigabytes of memory (2666) for 33 tr, which is an amount that I believe is just smartos at this difficult time. In summary, I was…

Pros
  • Positive performance with an eye toward the future

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

This CPU was purchased in China for $24,000 (mom's asrock x370 killer slit + ryzen 1700). This processor's power is vastly overkill for commonplace and gaming tasks; I was able to load more than half of it with just 12 lineage 2 classic windows. Overclocking this CPU is unnecessary. plenty of juice for games plus browser plus Mouzon kinchik, etc. in the background. Friendly for extended use: Nothing loads when trying to play GTA Online, Dota 2, and surf the web. 100% Multiplayer games of GTA…

Pros
  • multitasking
Cons
  • 1) Acceleration-related tambourine dancing 2) Unprocessed host

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

I will start off by stating that in the past I have used products from both Intel and AMD. I do not favor any one brand and instead cast my vote for the option that I believe will be most beneficial to me in the immediate future. To a large extent, I do not lament the decision to make the buy. Those that alter their percentage every 5 years are the ones I recommend buying for. If you buy a percentage for working, calculating, or rendering, then I don't see an option from Intel that costs the…

Pros
  • The ratio of cost to benefit.
Cons
  • When performing relative overclocking, keep in mind that not all RAM modules begin operating at the same frequency.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Many reviewers claim that in-game performance is 20% slower than on an i7 processor. I can get by with 100 or 120 frames per second. I can play, I can render video, and the process is swift. Paid $14,900 for OEM plus $440 for a Zalman CNPS9X Optima cooler. Tried overclocking; 4GHz at 1.35v was steady. I'm sticking at 3.6 GHz and 1.25 volts permanently (which is below the ASUS B350 prime plus's factory settings by 0.1 volts). Temperatures without overclocking range from 50 to 55 degrees while…

Pros
  • ryzen 7 1800x is a fast processor, suitable for any and all uses.
Cons
  • Not yet known

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

If someone had told me 12 months ago that I would choose AMD for a new PC in a year, not Intel, then I would have laughed very loudly right in his face, spraying saliva, answering that only if I I want to punish myself with eternal torment of waiting with an act of self-immolation at the end. It turned out that someone would be right. Only in the end, I would buy myself a processor that is inferior to the analogue from Intel for a MORE high amount only in games where multithreading is not…

Pros
  • - Fast. I bought it mainly to work in 3DS MAX for my wife, but I use it as a CPU for games. For rendering, it is simply incomparable - of course, it is VERY large order superior to the assembly on 2 Xeons, and one Xeon is ahead of 2 times. But now I'm talking about processors that cost $ 1000-1900, depending on the model and about this , for $400. The top consumer Intel i7-7700 will lose in the test, and the $1,000 6950 won't beat it by much. In games, fps is very high. If you do not feel the difference between 100 and 110 FPS, you can safely choose Ryzen. - rather cold. As far as I know, on models 1700x, 1800x, the temperature is too high by 20 degrees. Even if this is not the case, the temperature is still quite low. I have not risen above 80 degrees yet.
Cons
  • - There is no full support for Windows 7, which is very sad. From the 10s so far, not a very good impression - it seems to me somehow not holistic, there is no single ergonomics and style, everything is somehow in pieces a little bit from 7, a little bit from 8, a little bit more any heresy. So for me this is a definite minus. -RAM requirements. At a higher frequency, from 2667, the performance is 10-20% higher, if the frequency is 3200, then compared to 2667, there is not such a big difference, but only 3-5%. This is according to the reviews. That's why I bought 2666 RAM.