Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 116
  • 5
    94
  • 4
    14
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, could have found something else.

I took to replace the i7 4790k at a frequency of 4.6, to upgrade to ddr4. The card remained the same - gtx 1060. The hassle began with ating the BIOS - 2600x did not start right away. I had to borrow a6 9500. I reinstalled win 10 with the latest 1803 build. 3d max, Revit, LR have become a little more lively - a small plus. In games with vert. synchronization at 75Hz and a 21:9 monitor did not notice any differences except for very unpleasant drawdowns and friezes. The processor did not drive…

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • The lack of the correct BIOS version for the processor.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

I took it to replace the hot fan 965. Everything flies, the score in win10 is 9.3 out of 9.9! Stable, put on b450m. Wound up with a bang without dancing with a tambourine. Installed win10 right away. Quietly chases through the ryzen master up to 4.1, although there is more than enough stock. Calmly pulls all the new ultras paired with a gtx1070. The best budget option. For 10 sput, roughly speaking, the pre-top percent! People 3770 merge for this price. After weighing the pros and cons of…

Pros
  • Fast, powerful Cold (idle 29, under pressure no more than 55) Adequate price Process 12
Cons
  • Never took OEM processors. I was very surprised when they handed me a plastic bag with protsik in the store without any packaging (not counting the plastic coaster in which the legs are recessed). It makes no sense to take the Cooler version IMHO, as well as the percent with the "x" index.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm impressed! Exactly the product deserves your attention.

There used to be a computer with AMD A8-6500. Now I have assembled a new computer, the difference is enormous. Windows loads three to four times faster, Firefox opens instantly, the system does not lag for the first five minutes after launch, lovely! I have not tested it in games yet, but it will definitely be better than my past. I overclocked it through the preset on the motherboard to 3.85 GHz, but it usually works at 3.7 GHz (still higher than the stock 3.4).

Pros
  • Very fast running speed, low heat generation

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

From my very first PC, I opted for AMD, apparently such a fate to root for outsiders) But my faith has paid off, now the era has come when Intel's power in the market has shaken. As for the processor itself, I will say that this is an excellent stone for the money and it will be enough for the average user in the coming years. Only advice to new customers, take the oem version without a cooler and buy a normal bag for + -1500 overclock and you will be happy. Overclocking is easy, I stopped at…

Pros
  • Heat dissipation (unlike old Athlons) Easy overclocking capability Performance
Cons
  • Prices do not fall, after all, the 3rd generation of ryzans has already come out

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

The PC was regularly ated, the old one has been working since 2022, there is a core i3-530 there. I used to think I'll take a quad-core - just their time. But, thanks to the advent of ryzens, competitors have added a couple of cores to their new models of stones, so I decided to take a six-core with an eye to the future. I chose between the i5-8500 and this stone, namely the ryzen 5 2600 (without x, boxed equipment) - due to the fact that the price of a ryzen with a video card did not differ…

Pros
  • Price / performance ratio, normal solder under the lid. Good for work applications.
Cons
  • There is no built-in video, like a competitor, so it didn’t work out in this regard (I don’t really play games, I didn’t build a PC for this). Although, if it were built-in, it would cost more.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturer's assurances, high quality.

If you want to use the standard turntable normally, then set the maximum processor state to 99% in the power consumption parameters. This will remove temperature fluctuations, and the maximum frequency will drop by only 150 megahertz, it will be 4100. Turn off auto overclocking in the BIOS immediately, on the contrary, it does not allow to accelerate to 4250. But Precision Boost Overdrive must be enabled.

Pros
  • Inexpensive powerful processor. I took a box version of the 2600x for a promotion for 9300, it cost 500 more than oem. I changed the standard cooling to the Arctic tower with 4 tubes, it is a bit expensive, but the very simple installation and mx-4 paste in the kit bribed me. Chases himself calmly up to 4250, keeps this frequency in games. In stress, when it goes over, if I'm not mistaken, 68 ° drops to 4150 -4100 but does not fall below. I could not heat more than 74-75 °.
Cons
  • Regular cooling is still rather weak.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best product, from those that I have viewed, I advise everyone!

In general, any stone must be considered from two different, but resource-intensive points of view. For entertainment, namely video games and professional activities. For video games, you need to rely on the processors in the latest generation of consoles. In this case, the gem is identical in performance to the gems in the new generation of consoles. Since most developers, when developing, are guided by the power of the latest consoles, this stone can be called the golden mean, no more…

Pros
  • Normal stone.
Cons
  • They are not here.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

We are talking about 2600 without X, I bought it for 8200. At first I looked towards 2700 and 3600 with and without X, but they are 1.5-1.7 times more expensive, while giving a performance increase of a maximum of 30-40% in multithreading, therefore having weighed decided that there is not much point in overpaying, tk. in my average tasks I won’t feel this difference, and I can load my 1060 video card with my head with this percentage. Before buying, think carefully about what performance you…

Pros
  • As of May 2022, the best price/performance ratio for multi-threaded tasks.
Cons
  • It is difficult to pick up the frequency and timings of RAM.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

I don't play games. I bought the processor 1.5 years ago with the expectation of using it for many years. Then I gave for the processor, motherboard and RAM less than the current price of the processor. Looking at its price today, I understand that I successfully invested and I regret that I didn’t take a few))) But this processor is good only for the price of two years ago! Today I would have already taken Ryzen 3 with the built-in and not soared. Or is it better to pay extra and buy the next…

Pros
  • For years of work!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

It was taken as an upgrade from the A10 kaveri, i. E. everything changed except for the graphics card. Clearly, everything has become much faster. Video performance also grew as expected due to faster memory - in DX11 + 6%, in DX12 + 12%. In "calm" mode - the temperature of the pebble is below 30 degrees. Under load, it flies up to ~ 75. On kaveri, the temperature was ~45, and under load it took off under 100.

Pros
  • Compared to the previous generation A10 (AM3+), it is "cooler". And, of course, more nimble.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

In general, I switched from socket AM3 + to AM4 after the MSI 970A-G43 motherboard failed. There are practically no motherboards on the AM3 + socket, all the more so you can’t buy new ones, I didn’t like the second-hand version (they brought a real city .). I bought a bunch of Gigabyte Aorus B450 PRO (it's expensive, I think I overpaid for this motherboard, but it looks cool and the quality is on top, it's clear that it's not some kind of ), AMD Rizen 5 2600 (at first I wanted 72700, but it was

Pros
  • Excellent price - quality - performance ratio
Cons
  • Not

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

Good processor. bought in 2022 for 8.5k I took 4025 MHz at 1.34v With the memory subsystem at the pebble, I was not very lucky. with a good b-die memory above 3266 MHz, stability could not be achieved, although it starts up to 3566 MHz. But ultra-low timings 14-12-12-12-24+secondaries resulted in low latency (61ns) and FPS stability in games. In warzone, pubg is stable at 120-180 fps In other games where the quality of the picture is more important, the focus is on the video card and the…

Pros
  • Price/Performance, especially overclocked
Cons
  • Overclocking memory subsystems, if you don’t like to dig deeper, it’s better to take Intel, which is less sensitive to system settings.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

In my opinion, the currently optimal processor in terms of price / performance ratio (not counting the secondary). For the home, on its basis, you can assemble a universal machine, the performance of which will be enough for all everyday tasks. A boxed cooler can be considered a relative disadvantage, for me the temperature with it is still a bit high (42-45 in idle).

Pros
  • - Price - Performance
Cons
  • Not

Revainrating 4 out of 5

What you need, a cool purchase, I advise you.

I have been using this stone for more than six months, no complaints. Worth cooling Thermalright ARO-M14O. 36 degrees in idle, under stress tests - I don’t remember anymore, but it’s definitely within the normal range. Mat board asus b450-pro gaming, 16GB memory, rx580 + ssd. Pubg - 66 degrees, 80 fps on ultra battle 1 - 68 degrees, 90 fps on ultra battle 5 - 66 degrees, 70 fps on ultras resident evil 2 - 70 degrees, 90 fps on almost ultras (except for some functions) assassin's creed origins -

Pros
  • Power, overclockability, price
Cons
  • Friezes, if you load the computer to the eyeballs

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

If you're building a PC under $1,000 and on a tight budget, this is definitely one of the best options. I took it for streams and games. Just Cause 4, Destiny 2, PUBG and other projects start up with a bang, I don’t see the need to overclock yet, I have enough for my eyes and even more. When choosing, I looked at last year's intels - the price frightened off, since my budget was back to back with them. AMD 2600 gave a margin of money + met my expectations. Before that, there was an Intel one…

Pros
  • 1. Price. The most adequate price for the OEM version (8300 at the beginning of March 2022). 2. Speed. In conjunction with the GTX 1660 and a terabyte SSD, it feels just wonderful. Memory should be taken only from 3000 MHz and no less. I’m not going to drive the percentage yet, it’s completely enough for me for games, streaming and editing. Nevertheless, apparently, this can be done, even without special shamanism. But the mother needs a B450, otherwise there will be problems with the BIOS (it may not start without flashing). 3. Excellent for rendering and recording.
Cons
  • Maybe someone will have few frequencies, but it seems to me that for such a price to look for something more productive is the best enemy of the good.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

I bought it at the beginning of 2022, it tormented me pretty much, in a case with one fan for blowing in and a baby for blowing out, threw it into sweat up to 60 degrees in idle, and 80 in load, turned off the bus, bought 3 more fans, ated Bios to 51 version (not exactly), in idle it became 28-31, well, I think I will turn on the boost, as a result 40-45 in idle, in the load in AAA games plus a torrent, plus a browser and a bunch of progs for monitoring, no more than 65, but if in AIDE turn on…

Pros
  • It costs a penny (8k), 6 cores, 12 threads, frequency 4.24 for all cores, everything just flies .
Cons
  • Bus with a wild jump on the jack up to 1.45, at a peak under 4.24, I don’t know how this will affect further . Not cold at all in the stress test up to 80-85 degrees freely

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A little bit not what I expected, generally fine.

In general, and briefly, AMD did not take into account the error of their FKS and rolled out another multi-core, but absolutely useless, at least for the average user whose needs are office programs and miracle toys. Merges into the trash in terms of single-threaded performance of the older processor i3 8350. To reveal its full potential, it requires inadequately expensive memory.

Pros
  • price many cores
Cons
  • 0 performance per core Disgusting box cooler Non-compliance with the declared characteristics (precision boost) max frequency 3.75 box cooler Requires expensive premium RAM

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best product, from those that I have viewed, I advise everyone!

Good mid-range in its segment, quite cold under gamma 300. We managed to start the RAM at a frequency of 3200 with timings 18 17 17 17 40. Works noticeably faster with overclocked RAM. It responds especially well to dual-channel (the difference with single-channel is almost 2 times for all applications, especially in games) After a system with a g4560 hyperstump, an excellent performance boost (it's understandable) I recommend the processor to anyone who combines entertainment and work with…

Pros
  • New platform, good multi-thread performance, cool
Cons
  • Capricious to RAM, in particular to frequency and timings.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

To get the maximum profit, I advise you to overclock the RAM to 3.2 Hz, you will already get a good boost without problems underclocked the percent. it turned out 4GHz at a voltage of 1.28v with a floating voltage idle 2GHz In gta5 I have 160fps with vcard 980 and 16gb ram In the trash 2 weave in batches The Witcher 3 is a game that destroys my card with any process) I regret that I did not take the 2700th

Pros
  • Amude has always loved Cheap and good had to take a little steam with overclocking there is potential
Cons
  • They still produce prots on these stupid legs for games i5 8400 will be more productive both in terms of average and minimum fps, what can you do (it will really cost 2-3tr more)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Im amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Everything is very cool, only there may be problems with the selection of the motherboard. Keep in mind that motherboards with the B350 and X370 chipsets go to the first generation of ryzens, i. E. 1xxx. They support the second generation, but if they were made before the age of 18, then they do not have an ated BIOS that the processor will not see and the mother will have to be brought to the service for flashing. So it's better to immediately buy with a normal socket for the second generation

Pros
  • Excellent processor. What games, coupled with 1060 and 16 gigs of memory, that rendering pulls perfectly. The best price / performance ratio for today. Overclocking capability.
Cons
  • Weak cooler in the box. I bought a 150 W cooler separately, and now the processor does not heat up above 50 degrees, which is generally a fairy tale for an overclocker.