Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📷 top-notch performance: camera canon eos 1d mark iv body in sleek black design logo

📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design Review

13

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
Electronics, 📷 Camera & Photo, 📷 Camera & Photo Accessories, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(9)
img 1 attached to 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design
img 2 attached to 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design
img 3 attached to 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design
img 4 attached to 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design

Photos by authors

(2)
img 10 attached to 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design
img 11 attached to 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design

Description of 📷 Top-Notch Performance: Camera Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Body in Sleek Black Design

camera type: reflex, matrix format: APS-H, number of effective megapixels of the matrix: 16.10, maximum video recording resolution: 1920x1080, maximum video frame rate: 60 fps, viewfinder type: reflex (TTL), bayonet mount: Canon EF, stabilizer images (photo): none, screen size: 3 ", screen: two screens, viewfinder operation, fixed

Reviews

Global ratings 13
  • 5
    10
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

Did a huge review of this unit on Paul Kretz's YT channel and Paul Kretz's Zen. Different pros: Indestructible assembly, chic tracking autofocus on the photo at such a rate of fire. Huge battery. Unique functionality (some functions are not even in the "penny"). The most comfortable ergonomics. Great Canon colors. One word can describe the device: professional. Worthy of its money even in 2022. Some cons: A crop factor of 1.3 is not convenient. There are no special lenses for it, they are not…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Outwardly, it does not differ, but in practice the camera has been specifically redesigned. Surprisingly good colors. Really improved AF, very tenacious, useful functions added auxiliary zones. I use bright optics, so I set the maximum ISO6400 limit. At 6400, the picture is clear, who are annoyed by small noises, it is easy to clean with noise reduction.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad buy, well worth the money.

I thought for a long time what to change to after 1Ds MIII (a wonderful camera, but I need large ISOs), the budget was small, I chose between 5D MIII and used 1D MIV. I don’t regret the choice, except for small useful innovations, then the fourth mark is a wonderful carcass, which, by the way, has a much higher resource and battery than the third penny (bat. block for MIII = additionalcomsts).Comparison of ISO with a new dime, maybe someone willcome in handy

Pros
  • - Dust / moisture protection - Very comfortable ergonomics (I don't want to switch to the younger series after 1D) - Strong autofocus - The camera is fully customizable for the owner, very flexible settings - Two flash drives - Hefty shutter resource - Shooting 10 frames per second (an indispensable thing for a sports correspondent) - Shooting video 1280x720 at 50 frames per second (for example, in order to make smooth slowdowns), and of course FHD shooting, not mandatory, but a useful feature. Maybe someday it will come in handy. - X-Sync 1/303c
Cons
  • Slightly inferior in the number of useful settings (for example, micro-adjustment of zoom lenses, reticle in the viewfinder, etc. ) and high ISO to the new 5D MIII, but this is not so significant if you buy a used carcass, the difference with the new brand is about 15 -30 thousand, depending on the region.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

My impression of the purchase is good, buy it.

Here I am holding in my hands a brand new camera Mark IV and an old Mark III. I'll try to compare them. I don’t know how the first author noticed that in practice everything is very reworked, it seems to me that his review is custom advertising. This is indicated by another point, the author of the review does not use ISO more than 6400. Why? After all, the new camera holds already 102400 (the second author with the maximum iso was also mistaken, he looked at the photo in some kind of editor…

Pros
  • Characteristics are better than Mark III, sensitivity, for example, 2-3 times. The camera is really more convenient in terms of a more elaborate software interface. Information is constantly displayed on the LCD screen, and the quality of the LCD has greatly increased. Again, video recording with the highest image quality has appeared, although practically nothing will come of shooting (more on this in the shortcomings). It seems that the Mark IV has better autofocus than its closest compeor Nikon D3s. I couldn’t feel this, apparently I didn’t have much experience (the Mark III had very big problems with focusing, at first Canon lied for a long time that this was not the case, then they recalled a bunch of cameras for rework).
Cons
  • The characteristics are noticeably worse than what is declared by the manufacturer, ISO 51200 and 102400 are really non-working, although the maximum declared ISO worked on previous models. I would like manufacturers not to write in those. characteristics of at least prof. models. You can shoot video only in very static scenes when refocusing is not needed. Well, something like news on TV. If the object is out of focus, you need to press * to refocus, as a result the image will blur (defocus) completely and then focus again correctly. Yes, in this case, the exposure will still be adjusted, i. E. the picture will play darker/lighter. So here is a video. If anyone knows how to focus video on the fly with their hands on the lens, then it will be just right for him. I haven't been able to do it yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

In general, the device inspires confidence. Nothing creaks, does not play, you hold it in your hands and you feel - THING. You need to take something off - you take it and you go to shoot. Nice feeling. ISO limited 6400, then a bit noisy in my opinion, but it's a matter of taste. If you shoot in b / w, then you can easily raise it without a doubt. And finally: Unfortunately, many of us still judge the professionalism of a photographer by his technique. A 1D demonstration with a large Elka…

Pros
  • Excellent autofocus. Rate of fire. Two memory cards, you can duplicate the shooting. Very grippy. Dust and moisture protection. The battery is enough for me for more than two thousand shots, which is unimaginably pleasing. Very convenient control, all the necessary buttons are at hand, you can change the shooting parameters very quickly, without looking up from the process.
Cons
  • Massive. Carrying it + a backpack with glasses (I shoot for fixes) periodically strains. Although some 5D + battery pack = the same. Not suitable for street photography (draws too much attention).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

I have been using units from Canon for 5 years already - now, after the new camera, I can’t look at the pictures taken by previous devices - there were much more unsuccessful (from the technical side) pictures due to the imperfection of the early cameras. I don’t consider the crop factor with a coefficient of 1.3 to be a disadvantage or some kind of compromise, this is a feature of this class of cameras from Canon, I even really like it, for reporting and sports shooting such a crop is very…

Pros
  • Finally, Canon has a normal rapid-fire model - in my opinion this is the first high-speed camera without flaws - really fast, tenacious and accurate (less than 10 years !) autofocus, a clear picture at sensitivity up to 3200 ISO, high (and in most redundant cases) resolution, fast buffer, excellent screen, when working with flash it gives less exposure errors than any other camera from Canon, impeccable ergonomics, device durability and unsurpassed service life
Cons
  • not detected (the noise of the mirror lifting mechanism, the price and weight of the camera do not count - in devices of this class it does not happen differently)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best product I have ever reviewed, I recommend it to everyone!

I switched to this camera after 5d mark3. At first, I was tormented by vague doubts until a couple of months passed. Compare photos, compare ease of use. Crop 1.26 turned out to be even a plus for me ! For me, it is important in the camera - recording immediately on 2 cards (there were situations when flash drives die). The battery life is simply amazing. I took 2770 frames, recorded 10 minutes of video and the remaining battery is 42%! I don't even take a second battery from home often. I…

Pros
  • Crop 1.26 Battery life Rate of fire 10fps Recording to 2 memory cards at once
Cons
  • Weight with lens more than 2kg.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

It's good that the choice was made in favor of this model (I thought at first about the 5d mark ii). Extremely satisfied! The camera is very ergonomic. Has some pros: I really like focusing - the number of points and speed, I can’t get enough of the quality of the photos. The rate of fire is impressive. The camera is very well thought out to the smallest detail. Despite its weight, it sits very comfortably in the hand and the hand does not get tired (I did not feel a difference in weight after…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

I can say that Sapop has finally made a good camera. One of the main advantages is that now you can work with such equipment without a flash. There is practically no noise up to ISO 5000. Now everything depends more and more on the speed of the photographer's reaction, the device works very confidently. I have been working with this unit recently, but I have never experienced such a thrill from shooting with any camera - the picture quality is very pleasing, the flexibility and speed of setting

Pros
  • 1) tank (all-weather and reliable) 2) picture (very good original quality, including high ISO) 3) battery (actually works out about 2022 frames) 4) speed and high flexibility of autofocus settings 5) Usability Live View
Cons
  • 1) price in 2022 (skim cream) 2) heavy (although my hands are strong - I get a little exhausted by the end of the day)

I have been comparing it with the 5D Mark III for several days, trying to understand how much tastier the innovations in 5d3 are. In terms of noise, 1d4 is about the same as 5d3, verified by our own multiple tests, though in the raw 1d4 file there is more color noise that disappears after converting from RAW, then it becomes obvious that the nature and strength of the noise in these cameras are comparable, with negligible ! overweight 5d3. Also, these cameras show a picture of approximately the

Pros
  • Build quality, reliability and reliability (shutter tested for shock resistance with a resource of 300,000 operations), autofocus (only 1DX is better) works at apertures up to 8, unlike the younger series where a maximum of 5.6 (you can use lenses with aperture 4 and extender 2x not losing autofocus). Also ease of operation, battery life, shooting speed and overall performance + small pleasant things.
Cons
  • The price, of course, is just the price. I don’t consider the size and weight to be a minus, compared to the 5d series with baht. block 1dmk4 is the same! At the same time, nothing backlashes if you press harder and there is no risk of breaking the clamping ring, trying once again to tighten it. Also, no need to twist the baht. block before shooting at very slow shutter speeds.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

I had a 1D mark III for some time. noisy and noisy. today I bought a 1D mark IV . I read different reviews dreaming about it many times . some write 3200 workers, some 6400 . late in the evening I set 6400, aperture 2.8 and went out to take pictures of everything in a row at my favorite aperture priority my opinion, iso 6400 is quite . the noise is barely visible, if you want it can be easily removed with minimal intervention, the picture remains alive . They say that 5D mark III and 1DX…

Pros
  • it’s good for everyone, it’s especially pleasing for units that they can press the trigger in the portrait position without twisting their arms, I have it hanging on my belt in this position and insane battery life
Cons
  • maybe weight, but it's worth it another moment . I don’t know if it’s adequate to write this in shortcomings . but my Chinese flash, which works great with 20D, for example, worked on mark iii starting from the second frame in the series, the first one didn’t flash . but it doesn’t work at all . he sees it, it shows the focal length on the lens, in general, everything is fine, but it doesn’t puff . I think the wise men from canon deliberately messed something up there so that I would give them money and not the Chinese))). and I’ll have to give it (

It's not worth taking, crop, problems, above. need a unit - see 1D X, do not need a unit - see 5D 4 generations. It’s hard to get away from the kenon, these are very balanced cameras, but the old units are a real headache for their owners, which they will try to shove at a high price! Pros: The quality of the product and support crosses out all the advantages. Has some cons: The extremely low level of the technical control department (it seems to me that it doesn’t exist in principle and…