Pros
- Full frame, correspondingly less noise compared to crop, the ability to shoot at a higher sensitivity, a wider dynamic range, accurate focusing (I work only on the center point), including in very difficult conditions in low light. Very good processor, fast with a good algorithm for processing pictures. Of the 10D, 30D, 40D, 50D, 70D that I had, the best picture in terms of noise, color reproduction. plus additional costs for hard drives (I have a large archive), more noise. I don’t need high burst shooting speed anymore, I work with flash, it introduces its limitations. The main advantage of this f / a is a very good picture, when switching from 50D a colossal leap in image quality. A tenacious battery. Regarding the small number of focus points, I repeat, I work only with the central one, I think that the process should be manageable. At the moment I have a 6D, 70D, 5D MarkIII, and so, in terms of image quality, it is not inferior to the 3rd brand in any way, I compared it, I didn’t find a difference. An excellent f / a for work, if you don’t bother with prestige. Very soft shutter response is a definite plus, there is less shake when shooting. Synchronization of 1/180, compared to 1/200 on brand 3, is purely arbitrary, the image is formed when the flash is fired, and its speed is much higher, and the difference is not large, not fundamental, rather a marketing ploy, to reduce the possibilities compared to the 3 mark.
Cons
- Short shutter life, broke at 97 thousand. It is not convenient to make corrections when working with a flash, it is hidden deeper than on 50D and 5DMark III, and the metering is worse than on brand 3, when working with a flash, the error is higher. In my opinion, it is light weight and small in size, personally it is inconvenient for me, but it can be a plus for someone.
Pros
- Low noise even when using a high ISO.
Cons
- BB is not operating as intended. There is no BB button. Not grippy. A steep price.
Pros
- working high ISO values; excellent autofocus, and even in very low light conditions.
Cons
- The display is very easily soiled; the DOF preview button is in the most unexpected place.
Pros
- In terms of usefulness for me: 1) Full frame. 2) The ability to adjust the focus. 3)GPS. 4)WI-FI 5)Light weight
Cons
- The coating of the upper part of the body is somehow too "toy". It is matte, and quickly collects dust (and the camera is positioned as a "travel camera"). The GPS drains the battery very quickly. The protective glass of the display leaves a feeling of "plasticity" (on my old 450th there was even a normal glass). There is no slot for a second memory card.
Pros
- Full frame sensor Autofocus sensitivity Fine tuning autofocus Additional screen
Cons
- No autofocus light No 2nd memory card slot No exposure compensation button
Pros
- FF, ISO, Grip, Battery, Price
Cons
- Uhm . nuuuuh . unless it fries potatoes :)
Pros
- Naturally full frame, comfortable grip, well-assembled, body materials are pleasant, high ISO 12 800 is quite possible to shoot, CENTRAL auto focus point is nimble and accurate, large and bright viewfinder (compared to 600d), back focus adjustment, XA correction profiles lenses, the ability to shoot non-full-size RAW
Cons
- The location of the buttons to the AF button, you need very long fingers to reach, there is no white balance button, you have to climb into the menu, the cross button is very inconvenient, the button for viewing the depth of field is also in an absurd position, on the display PLASTIC not glass tends to catch scratches, the MAIN DEFECT is this coating frame with auto focus points, they are all collected in the center and in addition to this there is only 1 cross-type point, I also had only one cross-type point in 600d, only the difference in the prices of these cameras is significant, there is no shutter speed of 1 \ 8000 is significant if you shoot on bright fixes not for that people buy 85 1.2 to close the aperture, not a completely magnesium case, yes, I know that wi-fi and gps will not work then, but they don’t need to be played around like that, except that although I liked sending photos to the phone, albeit slowly, the shutter resource is only 100k frames, dust on the matrix in the first 200 frames, only 1 flash card from competitor Nikon D600 2 SD.
Pros
- - FULL FRAME. Canon's latest full-frame sensor camera. The price is normal, especially since it goes down) - BITRATE. When video-shooting the same scenes, the file bitrate was on average 5% higher than that of 5D mark 3. Yes, yes. Also, the camera does more compression, where it is possible without loss. For example, if we compare a completely black frame on 6D and 5Dm3, then on 6D the file will weigh much less. Perhaps another compression method is written for 6D. - HIGH WORKING ISO. When shooting video, the camera shows slightly less noise than 5Dm3, although the built-in noise reduction is likely to be stronger. And of course, complete superiority compared to 5dm2. ISO 12800 gives a completely normal picture - a minimum of color noise. It is also possible to set limits for auto-iso. - SIZE AND WEIGHT. The camera is relatively light, not big. Pleasantly sits in the hand. Despite the fact that the material for the camera is cheaper - plastic, it is of high quality, pleasant. For some reason, it was easier for me to balance it for a steadic than 5DM2. - SHUTTER SOUND. I personally really liked the new shutter sound, so soft, like a rifle with a silencer you have)) - A BATTERY similar to 5dm2 (LP-E6) in terms of battery type (this is a plus), but with a chip different from 5dm2 (this is a minus). - NEW MENU. I personally really like 6D, it's more convenient than 5D mark III - SWITCH between photo and video mode. Personally, for video, this is very convenient. - DISPLAY. Slightly better quality than 5dm2 and, in theory, slightly better quality than 5DM3 - the fact is that they have different sizes, but the number of pixels is the same. So the pixel density is 6d more.
Cons
- For me personally, as a video: - SHUTTER SHUTTER 1/4000. In video mode and on 5d, there were the same shutter speed restrictions, so it’s no stranger. In principle, it is not recommended to shoot at such a shutter speed (with a video, the softness of the picture is lost, with a photo - a large load on the mechanics). - SD CARDS. At first, this seemed like a big minus to me, since SD loses in terms of CF speed, but now there is a fairly large selection of smart SD cards. So this minus also disappeared over time. - BATTERIES have a chip different from 5d m2. Therefore, if you bought Chinese batteries that worked on 5dm2 and were charged on the original charge, then on 6d they most likely will not show the CHARGE INDICATOR, and will not even be charged from charging 6D. - NO BUTTON for quick white balance adjustment. Although of course this is not critical, and a matter of habit. Also, the absence of other buttons, such as Picture profile. - WI-FI does not work in video mode. Therefore, for me, its functionality is zero. May be useful for photographers. Works fine on iphone and ipad. Without any obvious problems.
Pros
- tenacious AF, comfortable grip, good ISO, mode dial in a circle, FF, quiet shutter, image quality
Cons
- Not very convenient management, especially do not like viewing / deleting photos. They made it even worse than it was on the 60D. I thought I'd get used to it - no, I'm not used to it. It seems like all the buttons were made on the right, which is convenient, but it turned out that not all - which is inconvenient. Well, there is only one card slot.
Pros
- The sensor is excellent, the menu is convenient, the case is well assembled, the RAVs are stretchy. Autofocus is very fast, ergonomics at the level!
Cons
- One cross focus point.
Pros
- Full frame, built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, good noise reduction at high ISO
Cons
- Location of control buttons
Pros
- - Picture quality (colors) - work of automation - Working ISO up to 3200-5000 depending on lighting - convenient management - the ability to use Canon optics on FF for that kind of money - all the advantages of a full frame, incl. and the quality and character of the picture - light - grippy center AF point
Cons
- Nothing criminal, but: - cheap plastic on displays instead of glass - flash sync speed 1/180s maximum sometimes not enough - a very small spread of AF points and, in general, their number - have been greatly reduced. - for modern tasks, I would like 26-30 megapixels
Pros
- Full frame! What does it give? Who did not know - a large bright viewfinder based on a pentaprism, a larger dynamic range. The picture is much nicer than the crop. much less noise, I like to take more pictures in the dark. on 650d iso 6400 death, here you can set 10k and not worry too much. I have autoiso, 100-12800, for six months I have never seen noise. At the same time, all noise reduction is disabled. Yes, the details are lost, but in general the picture remains quite decent. Magnesium alloy body - very nice in the hand, but not heavy, especially with a pancake) Another important thing is that you don't have to practice math. I put on my pancake 40 mm, it is 40 mm, not 64 mm ether. BB defines itself well. This is probably why there is no separate bb button. The picture is very clean, some pictures without processing can be pushed to instagram contacts, if anyone needs it. The battery is quite tenacious, if you do not abuse viewing on the screen and using WiFi. You can shoot for a long time and leave the camera turned on, when not in use, it goes into standby mode after a while and can safely wait another week. The shutter is quite pleasant in sound. Compared with the first 1D. In that one - as if the striker is hitting the bullet) Quiet mode is generally a separate song, a barely audible click. It comes in handy in places such as temples and cathedrals, or when you need to take a couple of shots as discreetly as possible.
Cons
- What prevented you from putting a touch-swivel-very convenient 3.2 screen from 650-700-70d ? Marketing. Also plastic instead of glass. the sit is here. 6d mark ii can be seen with such a screen. the lack of screen touch is partially solved by the presence of wifi, but the eos remote application itself is still raw and slow. Yes Yes! Since last December, it has been hanging in the market, they could climb from their Japanese stove and finish it off a bit. . - on iOS, both the preview and the pictures themselves are quickly loaded. anroid - the client cannot boast of such a thing yet. tested on my one m7, iphone 5s and xperia m. the af module could have been delivered from 7d. I'm not complaining yet, but still, they were afraid like fire for the top five and its sale. not very rapid-fire, but in principle you can live. Actually, the camera is not reporting. On the central point, even with a lack of light, it holds focus very confidently. After the crop, I was surprised that you can not change the background of the menu. why? Do serious guys only have a black background? :) Joy is not very convenient, IMHO. absolutely moronic place chosen for the preview button flu. seriously. yes, you can hang an electronic level on it, but until you reach it . In general, you can even scold 1DX for not brewing coffee, but here - yes, there are shortcomings, but in general and in general - everything is fine.
Pros
- full frame, gps, wifi
Cons
- gps does not turn off when the camera is turned off and eats the battery in Stakhanov's way. wifi transfers pictures to the ipad in the amount of 200kb.
