Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
๐Ÿƒ high-performance olive drab running shorts for men by condor logo

๐Ÿƒ High-Performance Olive Drab Running Shorts for Men by CONDOR Review

6

ยท

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5ย ย 
Ratingย 
4.5
๐Ÿ‰ Australian Rules Football, ๐Ÿฅ‹ Sports & Fitness

View on AmazonView on ะฏM

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to ๐Ÿƒ High-Performance Olive Drab Running Shorts for Men by CONDOR

Description of ๐Ÿƒ High-Performance Olive Drab Running Shorts for Men by CONDOR

100% Nylon. Elastic closure. 100% Nylon Mesh Fabric. Elastic Waist Band. Hidden Key Pocket. 2.25" inseam.

Reviews

Global ratings 6
  • 5
    4
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect fit for me!

Very soft and silky short and comfortably long. Inner briefs are very comfortable and more comfortable than soft shorts. Perfect fit for me at 230 pounds and six feet tall. Ideal for workouts and as underwear. I love Condor products!

Pros
  • Ideal for a small home
Cons
  • No instructions

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Back to Running: Shorts

Bought to get back running. These are the ones we got at the military training camp. I've gotten fatter since I left so they fit a bit tight but if you're already in uniform they will no doubt fit like I remember from the army. Good product. Cool and comfortable. These running shorts are high-rise and lined to keep everything in.

Pros
  • practical
Cons
  • Damaged

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Condor vs. Soffe for shorts

I have both. Here are the differences. Soffe is made in El Salvador, Condor in China. Soffe is slightly heavier than Condor (both are very light, but Condor is easier to see through). The Soffe key case is well made, the Condor key case is a joke (I never use it - I cut it out a lot). Condor is slightly denser (very light). I wear large in both Soffe and Condor and have a 33 inch waist. Fabric more choice of colors. Both fit perfectly. I haven't seen any difference in durability yet. If I needโ€ฆ

Pros
  • High marks for support and durability from testers
Cons
  • 0

Revainrating 5 out of 5

If you have eggs, you will love them.

Excellent rangers. They are very similar to Soffee. Condor is slightly more transparent than Soffee. I have a green pair and in certain light you can see the liner underneath the shorts. The material may appear transparent when held up to the light, but will not show through when worn. Besides, who's really staring at my shorts when I'm running? Condor's belt appears to be a little tighter than Sophie's. Maybe after many runs and washes it will start to loosen up. Otherwise great shorts. And if

Pros
  • Excellent overall performance
Cons
  • There are problems

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Free, light and somehow transparent.

I have these in black and love them! They're short, but thanks to the lining, everything is hidden, so you don't have to wear anything underneath. Also, being short is kind of a point. It's a cheap material but not uncomfortable. I use them specifically for my legs in the gym and sometimes for back or cardio. In fact, every day I prefer clothes that don't restrict my movement at all. They are true to size but the (very short) length is loose at the end so they ride up a bit if you're carrying a

Pros
  • Great for me
Cons
  • Some bugs

Revainrating 3 out of 5

externally satisfactory internally excellent.

It's bigger than I expected. I was referring to the attached photo which only shows shorts, not anyone in them. It just looked like the outer shell was smaller. But it's big and I ordered a size small when I usually wear medium. The waistband fits well but the outer shorts are larger than I thought. The inner lining fitted well. A little loose, but just how I wanted it. But I think they will. I like to work out or run in very short shorts. I don't like those knee length shorts. Too muchโ€ฆ

Pros
  • Hard wearing finish
Cons
  • I vaguely remember