Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
hikvision 1tb m.2 ssd hs-ssd-e3000/1024g logo

Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G Review

10

·

Very good

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.1
Computers, 💻 Computer Components, 🧰 Computer Internal Components, 💻 Computer Components

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(8)
img 1 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G
img 2 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G
img 3 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G
img 4 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G

Photos by authors

(5)
img 9 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G
img 10 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G
img 11 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G
img 12 attached to Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G

Description of Hikvision 1TB M.2 SSD HS-SSD-E3000/1024G

The Hikvision E3000 line of SSDs is based on NAND flash - 3D TLC. SSDs are suitable for a wide range of consumer and embedded platforms with demanding client applications and high multitasking requirements. Thanks to the special shape of the memory cells, the reliability, durability and speed of interaction between the processor and the storage device are increased.

Reviews

Global ratings 10
  • 5
    6
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, not disappointed.

CrystalDiskInfo does not show the Transfer mode, perhaps something needs to be changed in the BIOS, since the SSD was installed in the NVME x4 / SATA3 slot.

Pros
  • Price-quality, does not get very hot, which is important when installing in a thin laptop.
Cons
  • Speeds are slower than most of the reviews here. This is due to the fact that there are 2 memory chips on the module, and not 4 as it was before, but for my tasks this is normal, I took it as a second disk into a free slot of the LG Gram 16Z90P laptop, where the standard Hynix SSD disk is 512 GB with speed records 3000 MB/s.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I put it in the computer and created a volume and it works, the temperatures are not high, I basically took it as 2 ssd for games. They put a screw in the kit, when used, the green LED works.

Pros
  • Relatively low cost compared to name brands Good read/write speeds

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The ratio of price and quality is very pleasing, I will repeat the purchase.

I bought it for 4999, inserted it into pci-e 2.0, since slot 3.0 is already occupied. Speeds. ~1600 read, write. Too lazy to check in slot 3.0. Ps Thanks to the commentators, if it were not for your work, I would not have bothered to read the specification of the mainland and did not find out that I have one prot m2 pci3.0 and the second pci2.0.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

In general, the SSD is excellent for its price, I took it for 4500 (this is taking into account the coupon for 1k), the speed corresponds to that declared. Summing up, we can say that this SSD is still the best in its price range.

Pros
  • There are many advantages, starting from the price and ending with the speed that this disk gives out, I installed a gigabyte g5 ge laptop and immediately started working (after creating a new simple volume), let's see how long it lasts. But given the manufacturer's warranty of 5 years, I think it will last a long time
Cons
  • Temperature, but this is not critical, you could not even write it down as a disadvantage

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Feel free to buy, for such a price, the quality is simply amazing.

I took it in an online trade, taking into account the bonuses I got it for 5.5k, it works in tandem with the Esapada USBnVME3 ver2 box, as a compact replacement or analogue for Zalman emulators + file washer)

Pros
  • Speed ​​depending on the installation location (motherboard, external box), size.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A practical product, nothing to complain about.

I don’t know how it should be, but judging by the photo in the reviews, it’s more or less similar for me. I checked it on an empty disk, with CrystalDiskMark 8, and 50% full, the difference is not significant . I can’t post a photo, because I reinstalled the system + the disk was already divided into 2 disks, and they disappeared . as for me, everything is fine.

Pros
  • Bolt included.
Cons
  • The bolt is so small that it barely screwed on. Expensive . even at a sale.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

Good solid ssd m2, took for 5300 with delivery. I put it in the computer, everything works, the temperatures are not high. In CrystalDisk Info drove, the speed declared keeps. I transferred 100 GB of the game from the old ssd to this one, the speed was 2.5 GB / s, taking into account that there were hundreds of folders and thousands of files in the game. I took it purely for games, since the old SSD sata is already out of order, it is 5 years old, and another 500 GB m2 is not enough, it is only

Pros
  • - The price does not bite (took for 5300) - Large volume - Good speed (games load at the speed of light) - High TBW - 5 year warranty
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is the most common, it could be worse.

Everywhere I could find information on the 1 TB version, including here in the reviews, everywhere up to this point there were 4 memory chips and all channels for 4 chips were used. It looks like I'm one of the first to come across a 1TB disk with two chips of higher density. If I knew that there is such an option, I would not buy or order with delivery, but would buy in a store where you can immediately refuse the goods. I attached tests, in CrystalDiskMark three measurements (in NVMe SSD…

Pros
  • In principle, the disc is normal for its price, if not for the Chinese roulette, as usual.
Cons
  • Not everything is so rosy with this 1TB drive. A disk bought in NIKS, through the Market here, with a volume of 1 TB 5 days ago already had "on board" not 4 memory chips, as many here in the reviews, but two, each with a larger capacity, as on a 2 TB model. Hence, the write speed in CrystalDiskMark is about 2022 mb/s, and the linear write in AIDA64 of the first 15% of the disk (cache with two 150 GB chips comes out) is about 1800 mb/s, then up to 80% of the disk is about 650 mb/s (almost twice less than here in the reviews) and the last 20% of the disk drops to about 220 mb / s. Those. speeds are approximately the same as on the 500 GB disk version, where there are also two chips. Linear recording in AIDA in time took 44 minutes 52 seconds (for comparison, here in the reviews 24 minutes 33 seconds, i. E. almost twice as long). Here in the reviews they mentioned the firmware from September, I have it from November 23, most likely mine was produced later and it looks like they started to solder two chips on the 1 TB model now, which means that with this option only the 2 TB version will be able to produce the speeds declared by the manufacturer. I was sure that the 1 TB version would definitely have 4 memory chips, after looking at all the reviews with tests, screenshots with info on the memory and the controller, where all the channels of the controller for 4 chips (CH4CE4) are involved, but when I opened the package at home and took out the disk, then I immediately realized that the declared speeds could not be seen as my own ears. As always, Chinese roulette. Whoever wants to get the speeds declared by the manufacturer and here in the reviews, keep in mind that on the 1 TB version, until you open the package and take out the disk, you will not know which option you will come across. If there are two chips, then alas .

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Fits the description completely, very satisfying.

There are practically no normal reviews, tests and information on it, so I ran several tests and compared it with the Samsung 980 (8+k), as a result, having a cost half as much as the Samsung (and I bought for 4.6k) loses to it only in the SLC size cache, but samsa hard sags in speed after filling the cache, to the level of sata ssd (550mb / s), and the E3000 confidently writes the entire volume (up to 90%) at a speed of 1.2gb / s and eventually finished the write test for as much as 10 minutes

Pros
  • Up to 90% of the volume writes at a speed of 1.2Gb / s even after the SLC cache is full
Cons
  • Small SLC cache (~80GB)