Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
intel i9 10900f desktop processor graphics logo

Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics Review

4

·

Excellent

Revainrating 5 out of 5  
Rating 
5.0
🧰 Computer Internal Components, 💻 Computer Components

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics
img 2 attached to Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics
img 3 attached to Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics
img 4 attached to Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics

Photos by authors

(1)
img 5 attached to Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics

Details

BrandIntel
CPU ManufacturerIntel
CPU ModelCore i9
CPU Speed2.8 GHz
PlatformWindows 10

Description of Intel I9 10900F Desktop Processor Graphics

10 cores / 20 threads. Socket Type LGA 1200. Up to 5.2 GHz. Compatible with Intel 400 series chipset based motherboards. Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Support. Intel Optane Memory Support. Cooler Included.

Reviews

Global ratings 4
  • 5
    4
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturer's assurances, high quality.

I took it for an office computer, i5 10400F was no longer exported, I had to fork out. But now I can’t present any questions about the speed of the system, it’s enough with a good margin for multitasking. Config on the screenshot + GTX 1050 Ti + PSU Seasonic at 550w. How justified is this assembly option, let everyone decide for himself. For my tasks it is quite enough, even with a small margin.

Pros
  • Lots of threads for multitasking without lags and thoughtfulness. Adequate TDP under real loads.
Cons
  • I had to install dropsy EKWB AIO 280mm.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

Good processor. I took a boxed version for 26,000 at a discount, it turned out to be profitable, it seems to me. Surprisingly, OEM versions are now sometimes more expensive than boxed ones. Of course, I didn't even unpack the cooler out of the box. The processor flexibly changes frequencies. At rest, it operates at a frequency of 1.6 to 3.0 GHz. In games from 3.7 to 4.9 GHz When rendering video in Premiere Pro, it outputs a frequency of 3.6 to 4.5 GHz. Few places get hot. In many games with…

Pros
  • + 10 cores 20 threads! (Main reason to buy in 2022) + Cold processor + Performs well in turbo-boost + Price/performance + Compared to my previous 6700K render speed increased by 50%
Cons
  • - The processor is a little free when rendering, it feels like it works at half power. It heats up to 59 degrees and the frequency barely reaches 4.0 GHz. For that, in games, it fries up to almost 5 GHz and heats up to 70 Celsius. Although, it would seem, they created it rather more for rendering. Paradox!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I chose between amd 3900x and this one, twisted it in the configurator for a long time, as a result, in the combination of mother + processor, I chose intel, benchmarks also show that it is a little faster. Ceteris paribus, I settled on Intel because of the reputation of a more reliable manufacturer and greater performance per core. There is a benchmark on the screen, but AVG floats in frequency from launch to launch, when monitoring through the dispatcher, usually 4.5-4.6, occasionally 4.8. In

Pros
  • Fast, rendering in 1080p 60fps->30fps flies, boosts up to 4.8Ghz on its own. It is heated very weakly, the cooler for 1.5k keeps it cold "without noise and dust". In games it loads very weakly, the only thing that can load it (for me) is the video rendering in Davinci. According to benchmarks, it was faster than the similarly priced AMD 3900x, motherboards for Intel also felt cheaper in terms of price-feature ratio. 20 threads is enough for the eyes
Cons
  • not very convenient installation of the cooler in this socket - my cooler partially blocked the memory slot and rests against the radiator on the motherboard with the mount, but this, perhaps, is a question for the motherboard

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very high quality product, it's not the first time I bought it.

Is it better than AMD? Now Intel is cheaper and produces more fps, so I'll say it's better. But if you suddenly render something, then it's probably worse . Now, in every review, Mom's expert renders something for sure. I write code and play sometimes, it compiles quickly, it gives out almost the maximum possible fps. I would also like to buy a 3080.

Pros
  • The most important thing is that, unlike the K version, it does not heat up like hell, you can get by with the quietest or perhaps even passive radiator like the Thermalright Macho, but I haven't tried it yet. It eats 130+W somewhere, if it is fully strained, while it is cheaper, and the difference in megahertz is vanishingly small.
Cons
  • I can't think of. can't overclock? But "overclocking" now means - to milk, it's good if, a hundred hertz, warming up the percent even more, and I can't stand the howl of the fans.