The most suitable use case is for recording vocals, or speech. Here he is amazing. Not suitable for natural/natural recording. Some pros: 1. Very easy to operate 2. Compact and lightweight 3. Powered by USB (if you feel sorry for the batteries, he does not feel sorry for them at all) 4. Writes voice very well Its cons: 1. High self-noise! I planned to use it in a scenario when the camera records video (landscape, nature, birds there), and the microphone records sound. It turns out that at…

I must admit that my familiarity with Zoom-branded products is not so superficial. I have both H5 and H1n. So - both have the same problem - the connectors for connecting the USB cable are unreliable. The H5 broke down in the first year of operation, one of the eight H1n - already in the first six months. For comparison - I had a lot of "Olimpus" DM-650, and their connectors are much more tenacious even in very crooked hands. Another problem is that, in comparison with the "Olimpus" DM-650…

I don't like this recorder. I took it to record sound for a YouTube video. Those. connected a loop or a cannon to it and recited the text. He was very noisy. Even on the galaxy s8 + smartphone, the sound turned out to be much cleaner. Therefore, he sold it. If you are going to write voice or quiet sounds, then it will definitely not work - the signal / noise ratio is too bad. Might be good if you have a loud microphone or need to write some concerts.

I think this model is overrated. I'm an amateur, not a pro. But my experience in the past participating in musical groups gave me some idea of ​​the sounds and its properties. No, the recorder writes quite tolerably. But for 7-8 thousand to get a device without accessories, you expect better quality. As already mentioned above, the red price for him is 3 thousand, I don’t know what to pay so much for here. Noise is a problem. Yes, and a well-known bug with volume buttons that make noise and…

Different pros: He writes very well, high sensitivity, he even writes superbly on a Chinese buttonhole, and writes superbly on a saramonik. Cons below: The plastic is flimsy, you won't be able to write with your hand, it transmits all the noise from the movement of the hand along the body, it accepts a flash drive up to 32 GB.

Parallel import product oriented to the Chinese market. Menu in Chinese. The price of such an assembly is clearly overpriced.

Pros below: Really compact. You can connect to a mixer or hook on a buttonhole - a multifunctional device. I used the first version before, here the management is more convenient. With its cons. With a plastic case, you need to be careful, there were no batteries in the order either.

In general, a very good recorder for various tasks (recording interviews, sound from the remote control, etc.) take it, you will not regret it) Different pros: ate in design, added sound level adjustment with a wheel, which is very convenient. The recorder itself has become lighter in comparison with the first version of h1. A more modern and more user-friendly interface. Cons below: The quality of the plastic has become worse (when compared with the h1 of the first version), the use of two…

With its pros. A very good recorder. ated version of Zoom h1 with fast response, limiter, additional features. Has some cons The volume wheel is very sensitive, it's risky to put a speaker in your pocket.

In my humble opinion, this is the best of all-rounders. That is, they can write music, voice, use it as a usb microphone. There is also Tascam dr-05. Thought he might take it. There, in the reviews, they write that it is just awesome and very natural . But damn it, it has a minus. You can not turn it on and write directly to the computer. Therefore, no. It is big and massive. It is more difficult to hide it if you write the sound on the buttonhole. In general, I still chose the classics. And…

I use to record a musical instrument. Everything suits me. The sound is very high quality, there is room for post-processing, although I'm not a professional. I bought it on Ali for 6150 in September 2022. I am satisfied with the purchase. Pros below: 1) The sound quality is great! I didn’t have recorders before and I didn’t work with sound. Therefore, the recording quality is felt in comparison with all sorts of smartphones and headsets. With it, you can even hear something that is not heard…

I have been using the old Zoom H1 model for 12 years now, without any complaints. It took a second microphone (too lazy to carry back and forth from work), I decided to try the ated one. And when he received it, he did not want to let go of his hands. Now I plow for several hours every day, both as a sound system, and as a microphone for conferences, and as a voice recorder itself. I record rehearsals on it, the readability of all instruments is excellent, I even sent successful takes a couple…

I have been doing sound for a long time since 1980, in short, it is smarter than the old man’s H1, purely programmatically, but with the same settings, the old ZOOM H1 does not (H1n) have a much larger range and does not eat up the initial phase and manages to softly compress the sound starting from a pause with a sharp pitch the instrument or the vocalist sang sharply, it doesn't matter. I recommend buying an old ZOOM H1 with a check.

From tips for recording. Better with a tripod. Set the sensitivity from -12 to -6, it is better to listen in parallel with headphones. The volume rockers should be sealed with tape, especially when recording by hand (minus, if you listen with headphones, you can’t change the volume) But for such a price, the recorder is super! Very satisfied! I recommend!