- Screen\sCamera\sPerformance
- Access to Samsung Pay was not implemented in a way that I found to be extremely convenient in my opinion. The Bixby bar can be found on the primary screen. After the call, there were some abnormalities in the music playback. It is inconvenient to open alerts in such a way that they are displayed on top of the window that is currently active. More can be found in the comments.
- photographs of a high grade taken under ideal lighting circumstances. Whoa, that's a lot of Maroshooting in general. Maintains its charge quite well.
- No voice control. The duplex mode is not available. There is no function for recording phone calls. There is no function on the phone that could possibly make it worth the money it costs. And I am curious as to why, up until this point, the phone made by Samsung has been so concerned about my hearing.
- It is unfortunate that we have to begin with the merits, but that is just the way it is. 1. This display is in great shape and very juicy. But as far as I can tell, there is nothing worse now available anywhere for a lower price and with the same level of amoled. 2. the firmware; They performed an excellent job, and it is a delight to put to use. Everything is in its proper location, the animations are not any less seamless than those on the iPhone, and the work itself is organic. To summarize, if you take some kind of A70, the firmware on that device is dozens of times more advanced than the firmware on the identical Xiaomi device. And in general, here I found myself thinking that if you take the galaxy A70 for a promotion, then Xiaomi in general loses a thousand miles. This is something that I just caught myself thinking. On the other hand, Samsung started to compete with the mas brand, which is significant in some way. 3. The manner in which the device rests in the hand The display is identical to that seen on the iPhone, but the overall size and dimensions of the gadget have been drastically reduced. 4. Good design. 5. It also takes good photos; the feature on the camera that creates a fish-eye effect is one of my favorites because it allows you to get closer to your subject while still capturing it in the frame; this opens up a lot of creative possibilities.
- Now we'll go into the meat and potatoes of my critique. In spite of the benefits that I pointed out, I believe that Samsung's attempt to swallow was unsuccessful. This is also the reason. 1. The prices have just come down from the ceiling. The cost of the stuffing that is placed into the s10 is exactly twice as much as it should be. In addition, a month later, the company released a line of galaxy A smartphones, which are essentially no worse than the S10 + (the same screen, the same cameras, the same firmware, the same battery, a slightly weaker processor, though, but it will be enough for the eye, there is an NFC chip), BUT this smartphone can be purchased for less than 20,000 dollars! Consider some shrewd approaches to marketing growth. Even for 25 to take for a sweet soul, isn't that not 78? Yes, even for that. What will not be contained within it? It is true that only backwards charging is pointless, but I do not believe that I have wasted my time. 2. Processor. They send us, in the year 2022, a galaxy on an Exynos CPU. This percentage comes from the sample taken the year before and focuses on the older architecture. The same Snapdragon 855 is around 30% more powerful, yet this does not make Samsung any more money; instead, they demand more money and are pushing their outdated product. Have a look at the tests that have been posted on YouTube; you are so far ahead of the competition that it is not even worth discussing. That is, what are your thoughts about it? Offer smart for 80,000, but install hardware from the previous year, which is less powerful than smart, for only 25,000? This comes off to me as a very big letdown. Take the same iPhone for example; Apple is able to offer competitive pricing, but the company's processors are the most powerful available in mobile devices anywhere in the world. As a result, customers are forced to choose between purchasing an iPhone and switching to Android, which forces them to part with a significant amount of cash. But when the situation flips around: the competition is severe, the market can shift 180 degrees every three months, yet basically they put the hardware from the previous year into their flagship product, and they report a record loss in sales while smiling. What is it like? If you can't produce a processor that can compete with others in the market, then why not just sell what's already available? I am at a loss for words to convey it. If I hadn't been able to pre-order the phone and pay for it in advance, I never would have purchased it for this one reason in the real world.
- screen, camera, performance, appearance
- proximity sensor operation
- Short: Screen Camera Autonomy +/- Sound
- Fingerprint scanner (but I'm used to it and don't really notice periodic recognition errors) Communication problems in places (everything is worse than 9+) Periodically there is heating during standard use (but not critical) in night mode, 9+ shots are better than 10+
- To be honest, there was no wow effect when buying, but the more I use it, the more I feel the difference compared to the Galaxy S8 +. Amazing speaker sound, camera, materials, storage capacity. My wife, who was generally skeptical about my purchase, compared the smartphone screen with the flagship OLED TV of 2022))).
- Very slippery without a cover. At first it sometimes warmed up, but after a few ates it went away.
- Sound (stereo)
- Dull Samsung keyboard, camera and stabilization - nothing special, the fingerprint recognition algorithm is nowhere worse. The price includes all the shortcomings. Side-curved screen.
- There is nfc
- 1) the fingerprint sensor works every other time, and with glass it is not recognized at all in 90% 2) very slippery 3) the price is greatly inflated, for a device with such shortcomings no more than 20,000 is fair.