- Not a bad camera, excellent display, NFC module, design, device size, plastic case.
- Bad fingerprint.
- Liked everything. A camera, a slot for a flash drive, a screen is something))) Beautiful color-white mother-of-pearl (transparent silicone case). Screen print works well.
- They simply don't exist.
- Screen, autonomy, functionality, software.
- Delay when calling (I have two SIM cards) numbers. Probably a whole second to wait. Less convenient than sending messages to Xiaomi. But these are minor quibbles. For 15,800 - this is how the phone cost me in 4/64 configuration - an excellent model.
- - Super AMOLED display; - productive stuffing; - 64 GB of memory; - stylish design; - 4000 mAh battery; - In-screen fingerprint scanner.
- The camera didn't live up to expectations.
- + AMOLED-display caused only positive emotions, the PWM level is low; + good design, fairly thin bezels around the display for a budget employee; + good OneUI shell, quite functional and nimble; + wide-angle lens allows you to get interesting pictures in good light; +NFC
- - plastic case; - a fairly average camera for its price, detail drops with a slight lack of light immediately; - Gorilla Glass 3rd generation; - crooked support for 2api out of the box, and, accordingly, Google cameras too; - the fingerprint scanner under the screen at first pleases, but then it causes inconvenience due to thoughtfulness, there is no desire to use it; - the official price of 20220r is clearly too high; - the autonomy of the phone did not surprise, despite the Amoled screen (enough for 16-18 hours of charge with gentle use)
- Nothing yet
- Fingerprint scanner, screen response to pressing, slows down, healthy (I did not expect that I could not work with one hand)
- high screen resolution with very high color reproduction; build quality; Samsung Pay; NFC fast charging; support for all WIFI standards, sees 5Hz on the router; 24/7 free support, both by phone and online chat
- the charge lasts exactly for a day (without games, with one SIM card); there is no optical stabilization in the rear camera; the selfie camera does not have autofocus; no wireless charging
- A normal phone for normal daily functions like making calls, using instant messengers/Internet/YouTube. has served faithfully for 2 years
- processor, but if you do not play demanding games it is enough. Not a rocket, of course, but, I repeat, an absolutely normal phone for daily use.
- In general, for the money, a normal phone good camera bright screen availability of NFC 2 sims + flash drive slot 3 months is not particularly slow.
- Of the shortcomings this is a fingerprint that works 3-5 times, quality of communication and mobile Internet. The battery is not the best, with active use it discharges very quickly.
- With all discounts and trade-in cost 6 All modern interfaces, the camera for video calls is normal. Separate slots for 2 sim cards and micro-cd.
- The camera is just awful. Sound (it just is, but no more) Huge frames, especially from the bottom, hence the large size of the smartphone. Not a high pixel density, in the model the price is lower and the index (a40) is even higher, just a paradox. The processor is a version of the flagship cut down in frequency, which is obviously why some applications, including contacts / dialing, think for a couple of seconds when opened.
- Excellent juicy screen, large, comfortable, decent performance, and the battery holds well, especially when I use it, I spent a long time digging with the settings in one ui, you can configure a lot, compared with Nokia 6 (2022) is also an excellent device, Samsung has a good camera , now I don’t know what I will do without the width, it’s very good, even though it’s at 8mp, it turns out tolerably
- I will supplement the review, I just haven’t found anything bad to say for myself yet.