Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
seagate exos 16tb enterprise st16000nm000j logo

Seagate Exos 16TB Enterprise ST16000NM000J Review

7

·

Average

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
3.8
🧰 Computer Internal Components, 💻 Computer Components

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Seagate Exos 16TB Enterprise ST16000NM000J
img 2 attached to Seagate Exos 16TB Enterprise ST16000NM000J
img 3 attached to Seagate Exos 16TB Enterprise ST16000NM000J
img 4 attached to Seagate Exos 16TB Enterprise ST16000NM000J

Description of Seagate Exos 16TB Enterprise ST16000NM000J

SCALABLE: Run big data applications to meet hyperscale demands. EFFICIENT: Get consistent performance with low latency and repeatable response times with enhanced caching. HIGH CAPACITY: Support data analytics capabilities and other dense architectures for highest rack-space efficiency. COST EFFECTIVE: Optimize TCO with the lowest cost per terabyte.

Reviews

Global ratings 7
  • 5
    4
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

I ordered a second one. I will try all the same to raise RAID 1 on them in the NAS Synology DS218, despite the fact that Synology does not declare support for this model, but support for SN02 firmware is announced in 7E8 : Synology DS218 accepted a couple of these HDDs

Pros
  • performance. Value for money per terabyte.
Cons
  • Head movement volume. Even in a case with a basket with vibration damping bushings.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Recommended brand for Synology NAS

Responsive and works as intended. This is my second HDD with a maximum of 4 bays. The best value is to see the price drop below $360. And it's better to stick to OEM than retail packaging.

Pros
  • Storage
Cons
  • Not the best

Revainrating 1 out of 5

DOA (Dead on Arrival)

Drive arrived damaged after waiting over a week to receive it despite being sold as Prime. Time will tell when the second disc approaches. NOT HAPPY YET! 2nd disc in order 2 arrived in working condition. I am still waiting for a replacement and it has been 5 days since I received a defective device notification.

Pros
  • Internal Hard Drives
Cons
  • Sad Hardware

Revainrating 5 out of 5

excellent quality and guarantee

As a seller I paid a little more for Tech on Tech as the drives would have come faster here. I confirmed the five-year warranty on both through the Seagate website. They arrived on time and well packaged. No unpacking and installation problems in my new DS920+. These aren't the quietest drives, but I knew that from research. The only question I was never answered was if I should do anything to ensure they are treated as 4Kn and not 512e. I'll investigate this issue further as I haven't done…

Pros
  • Electronics
Cons
  • Slightly wrinkled

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Recommended brand name for Synology NAS

Responsive and works as intended. This is my second HDD with a maximum of 4 bays. The best value is to see the price drop below $360. And it's better to stick to OEM than retail packaging.

Pros
  • HIGH CAPACITY: supports data analysis and other high-density architectures for maximum rack space efficiency
Cons
  • Newer model could have been chosen

Revainrating 1 out of 5

DOA (dead on arrival)

The drive arrived damaged after waiting over a week to receive it despite being sold as a primary drive. Time will tell when the second disc approaches. NOT HAPPY YET! 2nd disc in order 2 arrived in working condition. I am still waiting for a replacement and it has been 5 days since I received a defective device notification.

Pros
  • LOW COST: TCO optimization with lowest cost per terabyte
Cons
  • Trade-in availability

Revainrating 5 out of 5

excellent quality and warranty

I paid a little more for Tech on Tech as a seller because the drives ship faster. I confirmed the five-year warranty on both through the Seagate website. They arrived on time and well packaged. No unpacking and installation problems in my new DS920+. These aren't the quietest drives, but I knew that from research. The only question I was never answered was if there was anything I should do to ensure they were treated as 4Kn and not 512e. I'll investigate this issue further as I haven't done…

Pros
  • SCALABLE: Run big data applications to meet hyperscale needs
Cons
  • Fits