Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
silicon power 2-pack 128gb usb 3.0/3.1 gen1 thumb drive blaze b02 - high-performance usb flash drive logo

Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive Review

5

·

Poor

Revainrating 3 out of 5  
Rating 
2.8
💾 USB Flash Drives, 💾 Data Storage

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive
img 2 attached to Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive
img 3 attached to Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive
img 4 attached to Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive

Photos by authors

(1)
img 5 attached to Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive

Details

Color128GB x2
Memory Storage Capacity128 GB
BrandSP Silicon Power
Hardware InterfaceUSB 3.0
Read Speed70

Description of Silicon Power 2-Pack 128GB USB 3.0/3.1 Gen1 Thumb Drive Blaze B02 - High-Performance USB Flash Drive

Strap-hole design for easy carrying. Plug and play, and it's compatible with Windows 10/8.1/8/7/Vista/XP, Mac OS 10.3.x or later, Linux 2.6.x or late. Backed by a 5 years warranty to promise complete services and technical support.

Reviews

Global ratings 5
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

This is the second representative of USB flash drives from Silicon Power. I took it as bootable from another OS so that I could work with it. Problems occurred with other inexpensive flash drives after a while - they first stopped recording anything, and then they simply died. This one has been doing its job well for over a year now.

Pros
  • Build quality, Price, work speed, Endurance (estimated by her ancestors)
Cons
  • not yet discovered

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Thought it would be better, but overall not bad.

With information about the write speed, it’s generally tense: the manufacturer has no information, only 10% of flash drives are indicated on the market. And this is at a time when not only "spaceships plow .", but there are already computers! ))) You can take a flash drive if you do not need high speed to record large volumes (such as urgently record a couple of 50GB movies and the taxi is already waiting, there is no extra hour). And so, if you add on the sly from time to time, slowly…

Pros
  • The reading speed is really about 100 Mb / s (megabytes per second and then everything is in MB / s. To whom in bits, multiply by 8). Not hot after active use, it is quite comfortable to hold with your hand, warm))). The view is beautiful, classic, metal-like. Relatively narrow (18 mm), you can insert where there is another usb nearby.
Cons
  • I read reviews here about 40 Mb / s for recording, bought it and it turned out to be partly true. When you start writing large files of several gigabytes (movies), the speed is immediately 40Mb / s, then after a couple of minutes 30Mb / s after 3 minutes the flash drive "chokes" and goes to a "cruising" speed of 25 Mb / s (ntfs and exFAT are the same) and with this constant speed is already adding everything else. This speed result for files 10,20,40,80 and 100 GB. With small files (photos, music), things are even worse on exFAT 20Mb / s, ntfs 17Mb / s, i. E. a flash drive will be written for about 2 hours and these promised 40 Mb / s can only be achieved when writing one file at a time of about 1 GB, that is, writing one file per minute. Then the flash drive "gets tired" and writes almost 2 times slower. The next file again starts briskly at 40 Mb/s and "gets tired" after a minute. It is not suitable for recording digital TV, the TV set "says" a "slow device", there is a mandatory streaming recording speed of 30 mb / s. (I tried other flash drives where the established speed is from 30 mb / s, recording from the TV set is normal). There are also 128 GB flash drives for comparison and they have a cruising (established) speed of 40 and 50 mb / s, and an external usb hard drive has 80 mb / s (in case you think that I have a connector or a slow computer). About formatting: ExFAT is a little faster, but still this format is not as versatile as ntfs. exFAT cannot be viewed on Windows XP, on many TVs, media players. And such a volume of a flash drive provides for cases sometimes to watch a movie from a friend on a TV set with beer or at the dacha on an old computer (with XP), turn on Mouzon, and exFAT seems to be with you and a lot of everything is recorded, but you can’t turn it on.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Upset and disappointed, the product is very bad!

I bought a 32g flash drive on the market. usb 3.1 fingers push through the body of the flash drive. on the flash drive was uploaded a link to the office. The Indian site on it had info speeds up to 10 Gb / s :)) but in fact I am recording a movie starting at 100 Mb / s in a couple of seconds. drops to 24 Mbps there are drawdowns up to 9 Mbps. I use another PQI i flash drive for 16 usb 3.0, the write speed is stable 32 Mbps.

Pros
  • price
Cons
  • write speed!

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The worst product for your money, I do not recommend it to anyone.

It was planned to be used as a distribution repository for installing operating systems. When uploading files, I was pleased with its speed and responsiveness. Compared to my previous smartbuy, it looked like a superman. Alas, the music did not play for long. Already at the first use, I ran into problems - many files gave error messages during installation. I decided that a malfunctioning USB port had corrupted the file table. I performed it, recorded it all over again. As a result, access to…

Pros
  • Chassis, operating speed
Cons
  • Broke almost immediately

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It has some flaws but the product is usable.

The original plan was to install Linux Mint as a portable OS. But as it turned out, it can only be suitable if you need to read / write large data. In practice, it is only suitable for media, text files. In the near future I will test the speed of the software in practice //Only for storing large files, or using small programs, such as MSI Afterburner Different pros: Large volume, read speed when working with large arrays for a short time Has cons: The speed of writing and reading when working