Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
skechers women's high waisted gowalk leggings logo

Skechers Women's High Waisted Gowalk Leggings Review

3

·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5  
Rating 
3.5
🏃‍♂️ Running, 🥋 Sports & Fitness

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Skechers Women's High Waisted Gowalk Leggings
img 2 attached to Skechers Women's High Waisted Gowalk Leggings
img 3 attached to Skechers Women's High Waisted Gowalk Leggings
img 4 attached to Skechers Women's High Waisted Gowalk Leggings

Description of Skechers Women's High Waisted Gowalk Leggings

88% Nylon, 12% Spandex. Imported. Pull On closure. Machine Wash. GOFLEX features a soft “cotton-like” hand feel and matte finish. 88% Nylon, 12% Spandex. High-waisted. Exterior side pockets. 26” inseam.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    2
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Disappointing Leggings for Runners

These leggings were a letdown. The material is too thin and stretches out easily. The pockets are small and barely hold anything. While they are comfortable, I wouldn't trust them for any serious sports and outdoors activities.

Pros
  • Comfortable material
Cons
  • Thin material, small pockets

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best Leggings on Fashion Sneakers

These are my favorite leggings! i buy black They don't show through, they have a nice dense fabric. They are very durable and not afraid of rapid wear, like thin basic leggings. Highly recommend, especially if you have hips that rub against each other and are concerned about inner thigh wear.

Pros
  • Just like everyone else
Cons
  • I won't say anything

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I love these leggings

I always buy leggings one size smaller and they fit very well. They were a little tight but they had a lot of compression. I love bags and I love how they "hold everything". The fabric is thicker so nothing shows through. I'm 5ft 6in and 123lbs for reference. I could also go with the medium.

Pros
  • Feels good
Cons
  • Something is wrong