Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A03 4/64 GB, Dual nano SIM, red Review
14
·
Average
Media
Description of Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A03 4/64 GB, Dual nano SIM, red
- High-quality mobile device with an expansive display.
- It seems to have been in use.
- It finally started working again after a month of repairs and a new mama. And there has been no need for a successor as of yet. Two hours of use time is possible on a single charge.
- There is no sound or video. Camera, microphone, and recording equipment. Screen visibility is poor. Jumping Klava. Unable to print. How did the firm get to 2022 and produce a product with a mid-zero profile?
- Good phone for your money. Bought for NG son 13 years old - his choice among other models.
- At this stage, testing has not yet been identified.
- Price, Battery
- Solid. Quality workmanship, apparently both inside and out.
- no merit
- Worst Samsung phone ever
- 1) There is support. (ates until 2024) 2) Good system / phone speed in general 3) More or less good screen (Bright, pixel density is excellent) 4) Good sound in headphones 5) Holds the battery well. 6) Good communication module.
- 1) The big minus of this phone is not its processor, but a poor oleophobic coating. The screen gets dirty quickly, and it becomes very unpleasant to crawl your finger across the screen. 2) The screen has a good pixel density, but the TFT matrix spoils everything. 3) No NFC (The phone was given to me, so some minuses will not affect the assessment) 4) The camera is not 48mp - but 12 (The system may write that 48, but in fact 12. Yes, even if you look at the characteristics of the processor, the processor can only process 16mp as much as possible) 5) MicroUSB - Are you serious? 6) The back cover is disgusting, scratched in an instant.