Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
๐Ÿ“ถ renewed tp-link cpe510 cpe/access point โ€“ long range high power outdoor 5ghz 300mbps, 802.11n/a, dual-polarized 13dbi directional antenna, passive poe logo

๐Ÿ“ถ Renewed TP-LINK CPE510 CPE/Access Point โ€“ Long Range High Power Outdoor 5GHz 300Mbps, 802.11n/a, Dual-Polarized 13dBi Directional Antenna, Passive POE Review

7

ยท

Average

Revainrating 4 out of 5ย ย 
Ratingย 
3.8
๐Ÿ“ถ Wireless Access Points, ๐Ÿ“ถ Networking Products

View on AmazonView on ะฏM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to ๐Ÿ“ถ Renewed TP-LINK CPE510 CPE/Access Point โ€“ Long Range High Power Outdoor 5GHz 300Mbps, 802.11n/a, Dual-Polarized 13dBi Directional Antenna, Passive POE
img 2 attached to ๐Ÿ“ถ Renewed TP-LINK CPE510 CPE/Access Point โ€“ Long Range High Power Outdoor 5GHz 300Mbps, 802.11n/a, Dual-Polarized 13dBi Directional Antenna, Passive POE
img 3 attached to ๐Ÿ“ถ Renewed TP-LINK CPE510 CPE/Access Point โ€“ Long Range High Power Outdoor 5GHz 300Mbps, 802.11n/a, Dual-Polarized 13dBi Directional Antenna, Passive POE
img 4 attached to ๐Ÿ“ถ Renewed TP-LINK CPE510 CPE/Access Point โ€“ Long Range High Power Outdoor 5GHz 300Mbps, 802.11n/a, Dual-Polarized 13dBi Directional Antenna, Passive POE

Description of ๐Ÿ“ถ Renewed TP-LINK CPE510 CPE/Access Point โ€“ Long Range High Power Outdoor 5GHz 300Mbps, 802.11n/a, Dual-Polarized 13dBi Directional Antenna, Passive POE

MPN: TPL#CPE510.

Reviews

Global ratings 7
  • 5
    3
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, a normal product.

A good alternative to other external devices, and it is sold in any computer market, unlike Ubnt or Microtik. So that he will find his buyer, who does not care about the cost. They worked as a bridge (TD + client) for two such 6 months for 2 km, now, redeployment for 200 meters, let's see how long it will work. There is no way to test the speed between devices, the admin panel either freezes or does not test anything.

Pros
  • Easy to set up in 2022, there is a separate contact for grounding, fastening.
Cons
  • Price! Other companies produce cheaper. BY. Speed โ€‹โ€‹tests are not possible.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The goods are normal, money is not wasted!

I set a window-window in the configuration, behind the glass, the distance is small, 100 meters, minor obstacles, the height from the ground is 5 meters. With a transmitter power of 10 dBi (out of a maximum of 13 available for 2022), I pumped a maximum of 92 Mbps one way by speedtest. net, given that the port is 100 Mbit - the result is excellent. Ping from one point to another 1-2 ms. The Wi-Fi connection was established at a speed of 150-180 Mbps. Of course, in order to be recommended forโ€ฆ

Pros
  • Performs the declared functions. It seems that there is an alternative OpenWRT firmware, in case of a lack of functions, you can try it, maybe it will work out . The signal strength indicators are located exactly on the side that I needed. Ubiquiti, which he considered as an alternative, has indicators on the back or on the opposite side.
Cons
  • There is no flexible VLAN configuration by ports (or did not figure it out). Given that the piece of iron has two ports, it would be great to separate them, then it would be possible to connect two separate grids with one bridge without the help of routers. No bridge mode, implemented via access point + client.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing ordinary, a normal product.

Not a bad CPE, it works like a clock, if you donโ€™t flatter the admin panel too many times, it can hang. It is strange that with its bipolar antenna it does not give out 100 Mbps. The imaginary MAXtream TDMA for me seemed to be nothing for small distances (you need to test for long distances). It costs more than Mikrotik. I advise those who want to organize a bridge to purchase Mikrotik SXT Lite 5 - it costs less, the bandwidth is higher and the OS is very flexible (albeit complicated).

Pros
  • Point is not bad, cheap replacement for Ubiquiti Nanostation M5 + Easy to set up +two Ethernet ports + Test mode (a la Compliance test) allows you to select any frequency (available on any firmware) + high quality
Cons
  • - Proprietary MAXtream TDMA protocol worse than Airmax -I could not forward the admin panel to the Internet - I just didnโ€™t try it, most likely a glitch in the firmware -Changed the parameters at the access point, the interface hung and it stopped working, I had to climb on the roof to reboot - at a distance of 500 meters I was able to squeeze out only 70 Mbps, which is very small, when compared with the Nanostation M5, it squeezes out 120 Mbps under the same conditions The lid is flimsy and doesn't even close.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

Since there is no opportunity to conduct a wired high-speed to a private house, I bought 2 such devices to create a wireless bridge at a distance of 1.5 km. I hung one device on the 5th floor of a five-story building, the second on the roof of the house, visibility is direct. provider Rostelecom leased line 100 Mb / s. The access points connected to each other at 240 Mb / s, the speed test of the Internet speed is 94-95 Mb / s incoming, 97-98 Mb / s outgoing, I am very satisfied. I have beenโ€ฆ

Pros
  • Easy to set up, POE, excellent link within 1.5 km
Cons
  • No

I bought my parents in the village, to bring optics from Rostelecom to a private house, especially in rural areas, the task is not the easiest, no matter how I tried, it didnโ€™t work out, I left everything and began to look towards the Wi-Fi bridge, since there is fiber optics in high-rise buildings, even though there are 8 apartments. I found one such house that looks in my direction, I placed the antenna on the roof on a small mast. the installation took place in the summer and on the path ofโ€ฆ

Pros
  • Price, availability, communication quality
Cons
  • For me, not essential, as they wrote in the reviews, the admin panel freezes, so I donโ€™t use it) but it really slows down)))