Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
yokohama parada spec-x 225/65 r17 102h summer logo

Yokohama Parada Spec-X 225/65 R17 102H summer Review

28

·

Very good

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.2
Pet Supplies, 🐦 Birds, 🏠 Bird Cages & Accessories, 🐦 Birds

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(13)
img 1 attached to Yokohama Parada Spec-X 225/65 R17 102H summer
img 2 attached to Yokohama Parada Spec-X 225/65 R17 102H summer
img 3 attached to Yokohama Parada Spec-X 225/65 R17 102H summer
img 4 attached to Yokohama Parada Spec-X 225/65 R17 102H summer

Description of Yokohama Parada Spec-X 225/65 R17 102H summer

Yokohama Parada Spec-X PA02Aggressive looking tire designed for SUVs like Hummer H2, Chrysler 300C, Chevy Tahoe, Ford Expedition, Land Rover, Toyota Land Cruiser, Volvo XC-90, etc. Tire size range - from 20 to 24 inches, which allows you to give expensive sports utility SUVs an exceptionally solid look. At the same time, excellent controllability and operating parameters of heavy machines are fully preserved. The new tire has an aggressive directional tread pattern, while the tire has a stylish look. Improved grip and braking parameters, moved the boundaries of the beginning of hydroplaning. The...

Reviews

Global ratings 28
  • 5
    16
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset by this product.

Reviews on the market helped me decide on tires. I'm not happy with the purchase. When it was time to dispose of them, I traveled approximately 30-35 kilometers and was relieved. (For comparison, my winter Hakka-7 left the 4th season with less than 40% wear on the spikes in place.) The Parade is "neither fish nor fowl," weak on the highway and weak off-road, neither comfortable nor athletic. It appears that an effort was made to develop a tire for a crossover that could be used on asphalt…

Pros
  • - Interesting tread design; it appears combative. This brings me to my next point. docile in the off-season and on light off-road. In the spring and fall, you can change your shoes sooner (without lines). Wide and deep gaps were filled with snow porridge, which adheres to the asphalt.
Cons
  • - Noise ! on a smooth piece of asphalt shrinks. Noise, in all speeds and modes, the remainder of the time. - Stability! In general, don't expect comfort, but it gets better as the tires warm up. - Keeps a straight line poorly and is moderately managed. I made sure the car's wheels were straight according to the standards, however the issue disappears after using winter tires. - The protection ages properly, although there is a subtle difference. The protection rips out in chunks on the sides of the front wheels. Earlier assessments have previously touched on this subject. The sidewall started to split after 2, 5, and the wheels were discarded. - The tread is obstructed with huge pebbles.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset with this product.

Rubber is aimed towards more powerful crossovers, but the front-wheel drive diesel Sangyong New Aktion was unable to handle the tire's performance. It was kept in suitable storage conditions, and timely balancing and camber control adjustments were made. I do not recommend The benefits of it include: Both the handling and wear resistance are about typical, with the exception of shredded parts of side sipes that can reach up to sixty percent. Made in Japan, to be more specific. It is not even…

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unattractive product, unprofitable purchase.

Up until the second year, nobody mentioned anything about the tire other than its narrow tread pattern (it is still intact, providing a smooth ride and responsive handling). I didn't notice the front axle's rubber peeling at the margins until the second season, when the maintenance master urged me to keep an eye out for the tiny lamellas that had been chopped off with a blade and hung to dry. I made sure the breaker was working properly. It's assumed that this effect is caused by the gradual…

Pros
  • Gentle, silent, and well-managed.
Cons
  • Stone-filled and relatively narrow tread. After two years (assuming a suitable manufacturing year and storage environment), the rubber started to peel.

purchased for the Lexus RX450H 235/55r19 this summer. The steering wheel has gotten substantially more precise after Velcro, and the bridgestone rubber feels more "elastic". Strangely enough, though, Yokohama "dissolves" and seems even a little calmer after 80 km/h. The city is quieter in the winter. It is quite stable at high speeds; you may change lanes at 130 mph without exerting yourself. He floats, thus he dislikes particularly deep puddles. I decided that one was enough; the sensation is…

Pros
  • comfy, built in Japan, quiet enough, and long-lasting.
Cons
  • Nearly always there are stones in the tread.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Has positive attributes like as low noise levels, outstanding road holding, resistance to hydroplaning, and even wear. Cons: Extremely delicate sidewalls Are a Dealbreaker! Already, I've swapped out two of the cylinders. I will have to change the tires because there will be an issue for the third time.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I can't stop being happy with the purchase, a very good deal!

Size 265/50/R20 set. Kolleynost as a phenomenon vanished. It rides quite safely and steadily in the rain, and its hydroplaning resistance is superb. Its deceleration is also adequate and predictable. Asphalt joints ceased smacking the automobile, and this substantially softened it. They create no noise and don't hum. attractive looks. sufficient for 60,000 kilometers. Highly advised. Before that, there were Yokohama Advan ST, which were far more formidable and just leapt out of the rut than…

Pros
  • Affordable, quiet, and soft.
Cons
  • Because the rubber is soft and the tread helps to pack stones, there are usually a lot of stones in the tread. drained of receiving. On the track, they do not fly out on their own, which results in a significant imbalance and beating.

I used the tires 225/60/18, and I've drove around 3,000 kilometers. Rubber is surprisingly quiet, reasonably hard, and completely controlled in all circumstances (someone writes about squeals in corners, screaming at speed, but I don't have this). Even when traveling at 90 mph through a 10 cm-deep puddle, I did not observe any hydroplaning at all; instead, the car drove straight ahead as if it were on dry tarmac. I left the cabin after two days of rain on clay and never got stuck; others were…

Pros
  • directional tread prevents aquaplaning, even at high speeds and in very deep puddles; superb handling prevents rutting; good off-road capability - Quiet
Cons
  • You need to remove small stones from the tread of the vehicle after driving on the dirt road.

The manufacturer markets this rubber for high-end SUVs, although only manufacturers like Great Wall and Haval fit the standard of Parada Spec-X. I DO NOT advise this rubber for owners of more expensive vehicles. Next season, I'm going to change. Its benefits cheaper than brand-name rivals. a good balance. Inventive tread design. handle well on slick surfaces. Cons: Loud and raucous. Since the track's terrain is so sensitive to speed, active steering is necessary.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

This fantastic tire was designed specifically for crossover vehicles, so don't think twice about using it on yours. The reviews suggest that the experience is less charming while using a car. If an early snowball catches you off guard and you don't change your shoes, it's okay since M + S i. E. is printed on the rubber in my dimension. Have a pleasant, relaxing, and secure trip.

Pros
  • Bought 235x65 R18 tires for my Nissan Murano. I had heard nice things about it, of course, but I had no idea that everything would be so great. - I am a very fast and dynamic driver; any imbalance is immediately apparent to me. This season, I had to change my tires because I had to balance the wheels four times due to beating and vibrations. No adjustments were needed to get the tire's balance just right; - The vehicle's handling has improved to that of a sedan, maybe as a result of the tire's small weight, which is especially noticeable when between lanes. Not only is it lighter, but it also uses less petrol per 100 kilometers driven, which is a bonus. Incredibly relaxing ride; despite the Murano's "soft" suspension, this tire makes the car feel as luxurious and relaxing as a Mercedes. Since no one has successfully eliminated tire-to-asphalt friction, the noise level is quite low but tolerable (thanks in part to the external soundproofing of the wheel wells). - The car drives itself, so there's no need to brake for potholes or uneven pavement, and you may cruise in complete safety and luxury. With just one hand on the wheel and "cruise control" engaged, you can unwind and enjoy the ride around the course.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A reliable product, quality is acceptable.

Do not be too lazy to check the manufacturer's website before debating the quietness or noise level of a set of tires. Yokohama has done a good job of outlining all the key features, including noise (unlike the identical Michelin). It's loud (76 dB), then. The 2022 cost is woefully insufficient. A set of these tires goes for about $150 in the US but around $300 in the UK. Check out the pricing of competing brands, many of which are comparable. The appointment is for high-end SUVs, and the price

Pros
  • Gorgeous, with acceptable wear resistance and excellent directional stability.
Cons
  • Noisy and costly (in the year 2022)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for the price.

The top of the line tire! My SUV came with a wide variety of customizable features. And sports tires "burned out" in a single season when subjected to intensive driving. This tire is built to last! 3 or 4 different seasons. I completely forgot about making the purchase! Despite the fact that I occasionally enjoy annealing at top speeds, which causes the brakes to perform poorly when stopping, and with a limited amount of tread also maintains its integrity. It is only in very heavy rain that it

Pros
  • Manuverability, wear resistance (three to four years), and the absence of kolley
Cons
  • It is not uncommon for the tread to become clogged with pebbles. ALL!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

If it takes a while to get cool tires, the resource says the cost should be about par. Crossover tires measuring 225/60R18. features advantages: Only had it for a few days. In a bind on the highway. We're on the right track. Rutted as if they simply lack emotion. Moves across or over rough terrain almost fearlessly, like a tank. It stops just when you want it to, decelerates smoothly, and seems to "grab" the road. All day long, rain drove along the rails at speeds of up to 110 kilometers per…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is the most common, it could be worse.

Those reviews convinced me to buy this tire. I guess I acted too quickly. For me, finding tires that are resistant to rutting and aquaplaning was a top priority. Kolleyness-wise, the tire checked in at 5+, despite the fact that I have it mounted at 275x40x20. Good grip on the road. I took a nighttime trip across Hong Kong, during which it poured steadily for the latter portion of the journey. Above 80 mph, hydroplaning becomes a noticeable phenomenon. Reviews on this site claim that it…

Pros
  • Break out of your rut
Cons
  • Extremely loud and powerful hydroplaning.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

I needed a replacement for the regular Bridgestone Dueler, which I found did not meet all of my needs, so I purchased this alternative. The two most important criteria are a lack of noise, sometimes known as silence, and dependable operation in any kind of summer weather. What did you get: I also liked that the road became "softer," where the dueler hit the suspension, the yoko passes with a slight sway; - the car began to coast longer; - in my dimension, the price turned out to be 1-2 thousand

Pros
  • Japanese-made, supple, silent, and economical; produced in Japan
Cons
  • the text itself

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

I searched for 2 weeks, found nothing, and carried 4 225/65/17 tires with me. I have no idea why, but I still managed to get them on order for 5100 each. I managed to ride them in the snow before I changed my shoes, and I was pleasantly impressed by how well the tires handled driving through snow and slush as well as holding and slowing down. They go smoothly, brake properly, and handle the road normally. However, they create more noise than winter Velcro after 60 km/h, and it gets…

Pros
  • high-quality, affordable, soft, holds the road well, sufficient weight, and attractive.
Cons
  • a constant barrage of noise.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am not disappointed, the quality is satisfying.

Has pros: Wet handling Maintains stability in the crevices Includes protection for the disk There were no punctures for a period of four years. Lightweight 12.5 kg in size 225/65/17 This large and still peaceful. Its cons: For the first year, I was stoned. For the fourth season, with only a couple of millimeters left, she started to swim, and it became far more difficult to maintain a straight line.

I lowered the standard profiles on two premium vehicles, one of which was a crossover, and the other was an SUV. In specifically, the size of this Yokohama tire was altered to 285/50/20 from the original size of 285/60/18. Both cars had a significant increase in their sensitivity to the rut, which causes the vehicle to slide in and out of control and is quite hazardous. Gentlemen, with our roads, you should not chase after a low European rubber profile since it is an absolute evil - in ruts…

Pros
  • Price that is low.
Cons
  • Under the radar.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

I recently made my second car purchase, an x-trail t31. For almost three seasons, I put in something around 70,000 total skate hours on the first set. Estimated between 20,000 and 25,000 kilometers. I think the tread depth was around 4-5 millimeters to the beacons and I sold it. Just like that, I bought one. The original computer Rubber-print impressions: On the highway, it goes directly to the track and does not react (if you rearrange from row to row on other wheels, it throws you out, but…

Pros
  • Accessible on foot, not overly boisterous, and generally accepted.
Cons
  • Noise increases with use, which is to be expected.

Impressions oh and oh, what cool tires. Size 285/50R20 They are quiet, it is strange that there is no "Quiet" mark on the site. On the highway, I hear the wind, but they are not. They drive straight and lead nowhere. The sidewall is medium hard. When driving through puddles, they feel confident. The tread pattern is (for me) beautiful. The car began to accelerate easier and faster. They brake - fine, there was already an emergency. I recommend

Pros
  • Super!
Cons
  • Until I found it, I had already driven 800 km. The price is that, I wish they were cheaper

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

Rubber was very pleased. Once I caught a car setup, because of a truck on the highway, a car rolled out at a very slow speed. I braked so I thought I would hit the asphalt with the front bumper :-))) but everything worked out. It makes no sense to take vegetable cars. It will be no better, and possibly worse than regular tires. I’m generally silent in the mud, there’s nothing to catch on this rubber.

Pros
  • Excellent grip on asphalt. I never managed to make the rubber squeak, although the driving style contributed to this. I skated for several seasons, after which I sold it separately from the car. surprisingly there was a good demand and gave a normal price. The wear was not very noticeable.
Cons
  • At the time of purchase, the price was quite high, about $500 per tire. When there was a flood and there was about 10-15 cm of water on the highway, I "floated", I had to go slower than a Lada :-) True, the tire width is to blame for this, the dimension was 275/45 / R20.