Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Christina Jones photo
Slovakia, Bratislava
1 Level
506 Review
0 Karma

Review on πŸ”§ Enhanced Phillips Norelco SH90/72 Replacement Heads for Series 9000 (Replaces SH90/62) by Christina Jones

Revainrating 4 out of 5

NO whole razor head; Blades with holder only

I received this because the blade holder on my shaving head was not working properly (there was a slight vibration at the bottom of the shaft, which reduced the shaver's efficiency). I've been getting frustrated thinking I'd have to spend $65-75 a year just to replace the razor blade head (since they hardly last that long) but when I saw that it only included the blades with the holder (didn't the blade holder) ), I received my return card immediately. Replacing the blades does not solve the blade holder vibration problem. I will just use my razor as is and replace the razor when it stops shaving altogether. I will absolutely NOT spend $70 a year on a half replacement head (I don't care what Philips says, it's not a full replacement head). The product page doesn't help either. You should have CLEARLY stated that the razor head consists of blades and holder only, not including the blade holder. Yes, looking at the site I see that they do NOT mention the blades and holder as two different parts, but even then I haven't seen anything that specifically mentions to a new buyer (like me) that the holder is a separate part is. If all you need are blades and a staple, then use them. If your blade holder is damaged on your razor, either survive it or buy a new razor as I can't find a replacement bail holder anywhere. Forgive me, this is my first electric razor and I'm stupid to think that a company wouldn't spend more than $4-6 to include a razor blade holder along with blades and a holder. How stupid of me to think like that! I think the joke is on me! *In the photos provided I have used my current old razor head to show what I was expecting compared to what I actually received.

Pros
  • Something's wrong
Cons
  • Something's wrong