Review on Continental Conti4x4Contact 265/60 R18 110H summer by Wiktor Janusz ᠌

235/50R19. For 60,000, it has established itself as a normal asphalt rubber. Moderately noisy, wearing out extremely quickly, something like a season arrived. But in general - not bad. On water it is quite worthy, if you do not get carried away with speed, then at 120-130 it behaves quite predictably and understandably. The neutral attitude towards the track is felt, but not critical. Braking on dry and wet surfaces is about the same, although it seemed to me personally that it was worse on dry. Very low wear resistance! Very. From my experience, only Nokian Hakka Green is worse. But only for durability! In general, I liked the tires. With very intensive use, there are, in fact, no complaints. Among the shortcomings, in addition to wear resistance, one can note the constant collection of small pebbles, glass and other various rubbish in the tread, which strives to send the wheel for another repair to a tire shop. But this is not a feature of this particular rubber, but rather a pattern, since many summer wheels behave in much the same way. I emphasize that the rubber is purely asphalt, on a muddy country road it is uncomfortable on it, although it has always been taken out, but . uncomfortable. On slightly deep sand, it rides quite well (Mercedes GLK 220 4matik, why shouldn’t it go)), but on snow and ice, it’s better not to. It is not necessary at all))). For your money, a normal option. I'm taking it next season. The second season is a carbon copy result. Over 55 thousand worn out by 85%. The disadvantages are the same. He is afraid of hitting the edges of the pits (hernias were cooked on the sidewalls of 2 wheels). Hard as a stool - after the winter Hakkapelita, at least cry at first. Everything else is the same as with the first set.