A little over a year ago, I purchased these headphones. Before to them, the Philips SHP8900 open type for 2700 served as my primary reference for sound quality. During that time period, I got the impression that they had the most pleasing sound for me. Then, for the benefit of the interest in sports, I made the decision to take more costly ears and ensure, as people comment on the forums, that such expensive ears play too honestly and are not interesting because of this fact. On the other hand, this did not turn out to be the case. The range and precision of sound produced by senkhs immediately captivated my attention. When compared to Philips, Bass sounds really fantastic. If you read the reviews on this website, you will see that many of them state that there is not enough bass for everyone. If you buy a normal sound card, at the very least an ASUS Xonar D1, you will realize that you have been misinformed. You can have as much bass as you want, but if you add equalizers to it, your head would hurt, and I don't know what kind of ears made of wood you would need to have in order to be able to withstand that kind of pressure. Even though I've used headphones like the Sony MDR-V55, AKG-K44, and Philips SHP2022/SHP8900, I can honestly say that the HD 280Pro's bass blows all of those away. On the MDR-V55 it is weaker, on the K44 the bass is rough and pressing on the ears, and they do not pump at 20 Hz; on the SHP-2022 they have a dip in the middle and high, and they generally play in a narrow range; on the SHP-8900 the bass is normal, but more weakly pronounced, but the high ones clatter more strongly, and I had to muffle the equalizers. On the other hand, the HD280Pro is easy on the ears and does not produce any unpleasant sensations. The bass pumps what it requires and takes such bottoms that none of the external subwoofers that I have ever heard simply reproduced such a cut of low frequencies. The bass pumps what it needs and takes such bottoms. The tops are see-through but do not pierce the ears; at the same time, they are quite see-through and do not overpower the bottoms with their volume. Even the part in the middle is wonderful. Even at extremely low volumes, there is no reduction in the frequency response, and every frequency may be heard in its full glory. The fabric used to craft the ear cushions is soft to the touch and can be wiped clean with napkins with relative ease. high-quality plastic that has a little bit of a generic look to it. After a year after having the ears operated on, it seems as though they have just taken them out of the packaging. I strongly encourage anyone who already owns or is about to purchase a nice device for listening to them to consider purchasing them. Despite this, on the built-in sounders they will still sound better than a number of consumer goods that cost 500.
π« Renewed SAMSUNG Galaxy Buds Pro R190: True Wireless, Noise Cancelling Bluetooth Earbuds
208 Review
Global Version HUAWEI Band 6 Fitness Tracker Smartwatch for Men and Women, 1.47ββ AMOLED Color Screen, All-Day SpO2 and Heart Rate Monitoring, 2-Week Battery Life, 5ATM Waterproof - Orange
190 Review
SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch (46Mm
259 Review
SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch Active2 (Aqua Black, R820-44mm) π± with Bluetooth, Silicon Strap, and Aluminum Bezel - International
248 Review