The tire is of high quality, especially considering its low cost. Although it is a good value for the money, it cannot be compared to the Dunlop in terms of durability or the Continental in terms of comfort and safety. However, it is a good value for the money. When compared to Kumho, this one is a little bit worse, but the price difference isn't that significant. I'm not going to do that again. Ford Focus automobile, tires 205/55 R16 Various advantages: To begin, I thought the pricing was fair, the amount of noise was manageable, and the vehicle's fuel efficiency had improved. When traveling at high speeds, the sound is barely audible, and it reliably maintains the trajectory on dry surfaces. Below are some downsides: When driving through puddles, the tire exhibits really poor behavior on a wet, filthy, or slippery surface (I don't mean ice!). Aquaplaning occurs, and the distance required to stop the vehicle rises. It is difficult to get started in the mud, and if you drive at a moderate speed on contaminated asphalt, you never know what kind of problems you can encounter. On painted lines or grass that has been recently mowed, it slips and begins sliding immediately.
Yokohama Ice Guard IG50 215/50 R17 99Q winter
36 Review
Nokian Tires Hakka Green 3 205/55 R16 94H summer
37 Review
Nokian Tires Nordman RS2 SUV 225/60 R18 104R winter
32 Review
4WD ORCISH Recovery Traction Boards Tracks Tire Ladder For Sand Snow Mud - Set Of 2 (2Nd Gen Bag + Mounting Pins, Black)
39 Review