Review on Intel Core i7-8700K: Unleash the Power of 6 Cores, Turbo Boost up to 4.7GHz – Perfect for LGA1151 300 Series Desktops! by Wiktor Jak ᠌

Name: Intel Core i7-8700K: Unleash the Power of 6 Cores, Turbo Boost up to 4.7GHz – Perfect for LGA1151 300 Series Desktops!
Item: Intel Core i7-8700K: Unleash the Power of 6 Cores, Turbo Boost up to 4.7GHz – Perfect for LGA1151 300 Series Desktops!
Rating: 3

May 26, 2023

Normal quality, you can use it.

Where to begin? Most likely with the Intel cult and their extremely powerful informational pressure, which may be compared to well-crafted propaganda. Friends who were persuaded that Intel was superior in all aspects, dozens of read and seen evaluations and comparisons that uniformly proclaimed a large advantage of the i7-8700 over the Ryzen 5 2600; it was between these two options that I decided to go with Intel. There is a theoretical gain of up to 20% in gaming performance over Ryzen, but if you have a top-tier graphic card, you won't be able to tell the difference visually. What are the key differences between frames 80 and 90, as well as frames 120 and 140? - no difference in visual perception. When not used for gaming, there is no discernible difference between the two.
The most significant drawback, which came in the shape of high temperature, was already recognized; nevertheless, the data on this is quite confusing, at least according to the reviews on this page, and as a result, I hoped for a ride but had no such luck. The central processing unit is extremely warm. There are fundamentalists who are complaining about the scalp, to which I have a clear response: why, why, purchase a processor for 22500r, especially not an overclockable copy, and then change it with a file, so forfeiting the warranty in the process and creating a fantastic potential to ruin it?
In light of the deficiencies that were outlined, the i7-8700 probably has a price tag that ranges between 16 and 18.
The purchase of the i7-8700 was not one that left me feeling particularly satisfied in the end. Because the processor is subjectively and ghostly superior to the Ryzen 5 2600, costs twice as much, and frustrates with its heat dissipation, I had the general impression that I had been nai misled. In the case of the latter, issues could develop over time as a result of the paste that is located under the lid.

Pros

(Some thoughts on the i7-8700) 1. Having 6 processor cores and 12 threads is a benefit, but there are also drawbacks to it. A structure like this one ought to already be established as the standard, allowing for some wiggle room for the future. It is common knowledge that the world would not have seen Intel's 6-core processors if it were not for AMD. 2. It will be one of the most accurate frames-per-second indicators available in games. 3. It will be beneficial for users who do not delve deeply into the operation of their gear, who do not monitor anything, and who, in general, believe in the unquestionable technological superiority of Intel over AMD. Windows 10 is, for users like me, the best operating system in the world since I bought it, installed it, and use it.

Cons

1. The presence of thermal paste behind the lid, which is the primary cause of the high temperature of the CPU. It is cooled by an Arctic Cooling Freezer 33, which ought to be more than adequate for a processor that has not been overclocked. However, in practice, the results are as follows: in games, 70-75 grams, and in tests, up to 86 grams. I was able to get up to 85g in games and up to 94g in tests after turning off the power savers to achieve a consistent 4.3GHz. 2. Uses deceptive methods with the frequency and voltage when the power savers are active in order to maintain an acceptable heat pack within the constraints of the system. This is not about being in an idle state or using 2D applications; rather, it is about testing and games that require consistent performance. Activating the maximum power limit on the motherboard makes it possible to view a picture of such cheating less frequently. However, this does not completely eliminate the issue; the processor will still attempt to "take another break." 3. Price. I paid 22,500 for the BOX version in the beginning of March, but I still believe that this price is unreasonable; more information may be found in the comments. 4. The policy of Intel is frustrating. Processors marked with a "K" are nothing more than a marketing gimmick. If the company were truly interested in customer satisfaction, it would unlock the multiplier for all of its models, just like AMD does. This policy stinks to high heaven. Users who desire the ability to personalize it themselves will be disappointed.