Review on 💪 AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 Black Edition: 6-Core Processor with Unparalleled Performance by Mateusz Gsiewski ᠌

The second machine had a C2D E6600 (3400 MHz self-overclocking, DDR2 667 MHz) processor. I made the decision to replace the computer a long time ago because I was quite irritated by Intel's refusal to drop the price of its quad-core processors. I considered switching to AMD's phenom II x4 when those processors were up to 4K while Intel quads were kept at the level of 11–8K, but I had to put up with it. I determined right away that enough with inetl, I'll try amd when the computer was full of mother + bp and it was time to eat it. They frequently argued that Intel brakes are cooler than AMD brakes in the workplace, etc. It didn't scare me because, according to several tests, amd'shki was a good fit for me. I tested the code first, and I was impressed at how rapidly everything rendered. to recall. and that's with a 32-bit version of Windows. What will happen when I upgrade to a 64-bit version? mmm Because of this, I didn't notice much of a difference in the old computer's overall performance. If only it were still alive, it would be sufficient for everyday tasks (apart from video coding and lanes). Given that there are so many reviews already here, why did I choose to create one? Just to refute the rumor that AMD brakes are bad, I have absolutely no regrets about switching to them. Such trash does not exist with a permanently interchangeable socket, and their costs are very costly. Additionally, the margin for multi-threads is justified even further by this proportion of 5000. By the way, the CPU revision for Germany was received for my note, therefore the box cooler performs admirably and doesn't overheat under load. With a copper-only Zalman 9500 cooler, the E6600 at 3.4Ghz heated up to 60°C under load and to about 45°C at idle. By the way, I appreciated the simple auto overclocking mechanism for 2 and all cores and the energy-saving feature in the new types of processors.