Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ivan Atanasov ᠌ photo
1 Level
288 Review
0 Karma

Review on Vacuum cleaner Samsung VC20M25, red by Ivan Atanasov ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the product suited me, the price is generally perfect.

Today I came to the realization that it's common for both favorable and negative evaluations to be fabricated. In this instance, the warning is to not let yourself be deceived. This price point gets you an excellent model. Someone has written that there are no filters or that they cannot be removed, however both of these statements are false. Someone has mentioned that it is really loud. This Samsung is much more quiet than my previous model, which was also far less powerful than this one. In addition, you should be aware that the noise level will increase in proportion to the suction power; in order to do accurate comparisons, all of the parameters should be held constant. I saw a review that claimed the cloth was of poor quality and flimsy, however the reality is quite the reverse. Someone has a problem with the dust bag, and they believe that a container would be more suitable. However, the reality is that in terms of performance, bagless ones will be noticeably inferior to those that cost the same amount of money. In addition, you will have to endure the agony of washing the container after each cleaning and then drying it once more, but you cannot avoid doing so if you wish for the suction force to be preserved. Additionally, the filters in these types of vacuum cleaners clog much more quickly than the filters in bag vacuums. Cleaning the filter will not assist; rather, you will need to replace it. In addition, the price of these filters is quite a bit higher than that of disposable bags. Not to mention the fact that very frugal women (like me) are capable of easily making such a bag with their own hands, all you have to do is google it. And one bag lasts a long time. There is a problem with the cord that someone else is using, and that is fine with me. I have a sneaking suspicion that these individuals did not even attempt to hold it with their hand while the operation was being completed, despite the fact that this is included in the instructions. Even the hose was not enough to satisfy some people's demands; this is often untrue. Because no one in this price range carries a turbo brush, consumers have voiced their dissatisfaction with the absence of one. In general, take it, you won't regret it.

Pros
  • 1. having a low weight 2. Handsome 3. Pleasant and quiet motor noise 4. A practical rotating handle located on the hose 5. The smaller nozzles are kept in a compartment on the vacuum cleaner itself, ensuring that they are not misplaced. 6. Effortless regulation of the electricity 7. Reasonable cost (the price was $5290, and the shares cost $4290), 8. A nifty instrument that takes the form of a cyclone filter 9. A telescopic tube of superior quality that does not stick or wobble when extended or contracted 10. It's a perfect suck))]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
Cons
  • Even though they are inconsequential: 1. The output filter's back cover has a slight plastic odor, but I believe this will dissipate over time. 2. There is an insufficient amount of vertical handle on the body of the vacuum cleaner. The horizontal handle is, of course, very helpful while you are cleaning, but the vertical handle is required while you are putting the vacuum cleaner back where it belongs.

Similar reviews