Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Agata Zuzankiewicz ᠌ photo
1 Level
152 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body Camera by Agata Zuzankiewicz ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A high-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I want to be clear right from the bat that I am not a photographer. I simply do not possess that kind of creative flair. But my knowledge of photography and technology is not secondhand; I have firsthand experience in both fields. My very first digital single-lens reflex camera was a 450 d, and ever since then, I've wanted to upgrade to a better model. Purchasing the initial FIX 50 1.8, followed by the initial ELKA, and so on, with rising values As a consequence of this, I am able to declare that I was the owner of the majority of the company's lenses, including the most expensive ones. But I didn't grow better at it. As a consequence of this, I decided to go with the 24-105 and the 50 1.4, as well as the realization that I still require such a device. This is not due to the fact that I make money off of it, but rather to the fact that I adore high-quality things and high-quality photographs. I bring this camera on every trip because the pictures are so good, especially those of night landscapes that were taken with a long exposure. We only have one chance at life, and it's important to make the most of it. I will generalize based on my experiences that this camera is what you need if you are a talented photographer and this is your work or if you require an excellent photo quality. In that case, I would suggest taking something that is less complicated yet has nice optics. A approach like this would have no additional significance if it were used in any other context. On to the meat of the matter. Camera Functions properly in all kinds of weather, including rain, snow, and heat. Noise starts to become noticeable between ISO 800 and 1600. There is a noise canceler that is already installed. In its weak mode, it takes action, but does so in a gentle manner. The autofocus performs well and is very stable, although it is not as quick as 7 d. I appreciate the way he creates the scripts for the videos. In most situations, my attention is simply drawn to the most important aspect, as this is all that is required. The automation process is effective. The white balance is almost never off. The range of possible values is fairly extensive. About 800 photos are possible before the battery needs to be replaced. The screen has a high level of quality. Ergonomics is a comfortable and addictive design. A really well-balanced apparatus, I would suggest it without a doubt; nevertheless, it should only be used in conjunction with high-quality glass.

Pros
  • camera has some merit)
Cons
  • I cannot even begin to guess. In comparison to 450 d, the noises do not bother me nearly as much, and I do not have any issues with the memory card cover. The sole decline in price and cost occurs with the release of mark 3, however this is a natural process that occurs over time.