1 Level
334 Review
0 Karma
Review on Vacuum cleaner Roidmi NEX X20, white by Wiktor Gajewski ᠌
Everything in the product suited me, the price is generally perfect.
The vacuum cleaner is not perfect, but very good. In terms of power and versatility, it is somewhere between the V10 and V11 from the Dyson. Dysons have even more attachments and ergonomics are sometimes better, but Rodimi has a backlit brush and a much lower price. I bought for 20,254 - the price for its capabilities and characteristics is just right. I was lucky with the price - now in the place where I took it, it costs 30+, this is too much.
Pros
- Great vacuum cleaner! Before him, I used Roidmi F8 for a year - a wonderful device, I am very pleased with it. The new one attracted higher power and a more convenient charger. What we liked: - Higher power, more engine speed, stronger vacuum. Feels like it vacuums the mattress better; - Less noise (although it's still loud in turbo mode); - Longer operating time on a single charge - more than 10 minutes in turbo mode; - The wall mount is similar to the F8 - magnetic, compact, does not allow hanging the vacuum cleaner without contact with the floor, it is attached to the wall with self-tapping screws or sticky adhesive. But now, when parking, the vacuum cleaner is charging - this was very lacking; - The charging plug is straight instead of L-shaped, it no longer needs to be oriented in a certain way (F8 allowed only two positions); - When charging after work, it immediately charges (F8 did not charge until the battery cools down, this is about an hour after working in turbo mode); - The possibility of replacing the battery is declared - for this you need to unscrew the hex screws, I have not tried it yet. No one is selling the battery yet. In a couple of years it will become relevant; - European power supply plug - round pins; - The dust collector no longer opens from the bottom, the design of the cyclone has been changed (there are fewer parts), the area of the metal mesh filter has been increased (it will clog later). The cyclone is now fixed in the bin by turning; - The HEPA filter can be washed, it is smaller, a magnet is built in (the vacuum cleaner cannot be started without a filter); - There is a second HEPA filter (post-motor) - a joy for allergy sufferers; - The impeller is covered with foam - less likely to damage; - Wet cleaning module - a tank with water and a cloth, attached with a magnet to the main brush. I haven’t tried it yet, but I don’t have high expectations, the design is similar to the wet cleaning unit in the Roborock S50 – purely wiping. Spare cloth included - A lot of nozzles: a large motor brush with light and two different cylindrical brushes to choose from, a small motor brush, crevice (+ furniture, inserted into it), crevice with a flexible hose.
Cons
- There are also disadvantages: - Small dust collector, difficult to shake out without getting your hands dirty; - The crevice nozzle is ineffective - the gap is too wide; - A nozzle with a flexible hose - similar to a slotted one, in addition, the tip is short. No wiring to power motor brushes; - A small furniture brush is mounted on the crevice, it is inconvenient and the tip of the crevice is scratched. What prevented you from making it a sliding part of the crevice nozzle, as on other models? - The small motorized brush lacks a hinge; - It would be cool to have a power button like on the Dyson - it works while it is pressed. Given the short time of operation in turbo mode, it is very relevant; - The rotor of the main brush is almost completely covered with a transparent casing, there is a small gap between it and the floor. This complicates the cleaning of large debris and makes it difficult to clean along the wall. Dyson's soft-roller nozzle is far superior; - The main brush would not interfere with direct drive (inside the rotor, like Dyson's) - it would be more compact; - Cannot be placed vertically without leaning against a wall. - Turn on now by long pressing; - Three modes - basic, high power and turbo. Basically, the power is adjusted (via the application). But if in F8 it was 80, 130 and 180 watts, then in NEX it was 60, 80 and 100 watts. High power mode is almost the same as 100 watts main and falls short of 180 watts in F8; - In F8, there was a foam circle in front of HEPA, it retained hair and other relatively large particles. NEX does not have it, as a result, HEPA is more contaminated and more difficult to clean; - There was a gasket at the bottom of the F8 cyclone - those who took it apart will understand what it is about, such a black flat ring of foam rubber at the bottom. In NEX, the groove for the gasket remains, but there is no ring itself. I suspect that without a ring, more garbage will reach HEPA; - Turnovers in turbo mode drop noticeably when the battery charge drops to half; - The battery temperature in the application is no longer shown. There are no statistics (how many percent of the time in what mode the vacuum cleaner worked) either.
