Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Yagami Iori photo
1 Level
85 Review
21 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy Note Smartphone 20 Ultra (SM-N985F) 8/256 GB RU, black by Yagami Iori

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

cameras. at 108 mp, photos of people during the day are too contrasting and sharp - in binning mode - test - finally, Samsung got rid of watercolor and oversharp, in general, the camera is a test - except for the front camera - it is always miserable except for the sun in the forehead - aperture ratio is not enough wild - total for the front camera the camera with s8 is absolutely the same. I shoot video 4/60 and I'm happy with the smoothness.

img 1 attached to Samsung Galaxy Note Smartphone 20 Ultra (SM-N985F) 8/256 GB RU, black review by Yagami Iori
img 2 attached to Samsung Galaxy Note Smartphone 20 Ultra (SM-N985F) 8/256 GB RU, black review by Yagami Iori
img 3 attached to Samsung Galaxy Note Smartphone 20 Ultra (SM-N985F) 8/256 GB RU, black review by Yagami Iori



Pros
  • normal use - medium economy mode - fhd and 60 hertz (120 I don’t need it), I don’t play games, whoever has a normal computer will understand. in my scenario (mostly on Wi-Fi, there was at least 4.5 hours of screen, a maximum of 7.5. In principle, I am satisfied. The discharge is predictable and there is no need to constantly recharge - on average, once every one and a half days stereo for me for the first time - well, ok - no wow
Cons
  • the main disadvantage of the device for me is no, not a battery, but the rattling of the main camera module is embarrassing - in the off state it "plays" in the case, it is clear that it is not critical and all that - but damn it, crap - you will buy - pay attention well, the battery, because of the localization in our countries, we were pushed by the exinos 990 processor with all its jambs (batteries zhor, low performance in the graph) with a 4g network and constant use of the phone - (navigation - kmmer) there will be 3-4 hours of screen - no more