Review on Tire Michelin Primacy 4 225/60 R17 99 V by Boban Danilovski ᠌

The Michelin Primacy 4 205/55 R16 91V tires are what I ride on during the second season. I removed Ceed from the passenger compartment and put Hankook Ventus Prime2 tires on it. I drove it for six years despite the fact that it was difficult and noisy; nonetheless, I was the one who drove it, so everything worked well for me. It was time for a change, and following an extensive search that included reading articles, testimonials, and recommendations, Michelin Primacy 4 was acquired. The very first thought that sprang to mind was that the pressure of 2.2 had just left the tire shop and had already pinned it! Because the rubber is pliable, I had the impression that the vehicle had changed. In terms of noise, the tires are quiet, the Shumka on Side left much to be desired, and it all depends on the asphalt surface; however, this model is significantly less noisy than the one it replaces. Up next, we have the ability to manage. (In most situations, I am a calm driver; but, there have been occasions on decent roads where I have been Hankook 200+ (now I recall why.? But it handled really well, the car pressed to the ground and scoured a little bit; I had to taxi it. On the track, I experienced an extremely upbeat and encouraging moment. There is a highway that connects the city and the suburbs, and the left lanes on both sides of the road have fallen into a rut. Once you're stuck in the rut, it's quite difficult to get out of it, so you have to accelerate quickly when you finally do. On Michelin you don't feel the track, that is, you cross it from left to right and back, and this does not affect control, no effort and strain, you just move over the bumps and that's it, I guess that because of the bead and the softness of the rubber, it clings to the edges of the rut and therefore you don't feel the transition, of course you feel a deeper rut, but the car steers much more pleasurably. Obviously not the "sea," the car continues to drive in a straight line with grace, and there is no sensation of losing control that can be perceived. TOTAL. Hankook has been in business for 6 years, and Michelin is in its 2nd year. If I had known there was such a distinction between the two, I would have switched to Michelin a long time ago. My question is directed toward KIA: why do you offer your vehicles with such tires? Michelin was a perfect fit for me, but the most essential question is obviously whether or not it is worth 4,700 dollars for a tire. and is it possible to obtain anything that is of higher quality? I do not regret!