I changed this rating from 3 to 5 stars after investigating the reason for the poor performance in my previous review. The SanDisk rep pointed out that the performance should be higher, so I checked. It turned out that my ASUS Maximus V Formula ROG gaming motherboard has two SATA controllers. A pair of SATA/600 ports are supported by the Intel Z77 chipset and four more SATA/600 ports are supported by the Asmedia chipset. Samsung was connected to an Intel SATA port and this drive was connected to Asmedia. The Asmedia chipset was inefficient, not this drive. Poor performance can also be caused by using an old specification. SATA cable. These are Crystal DiskMark test results with both drives connected to Intel SATA ports. The first column is for Samsung and the second for San-Disk. Sequential Read: 500MB/s 495MB/s Sequential Write: 450MB/s 488MB/s 512KB Random Read: 426MB/s 335MB/s Random Read 512KB Write: 369MB/s 431MB/s Random 4KB Read (QD=1): 28.5MB/s 30.6MB/s 4KB Random Write (QD=1): 56.4MB/s 64.6MB/s 4KB Random Read (QD= 32): 280 MB/s 396 MB/s 4 KB Random Write (QD=32): 142 MB/s 291 MB/s is slightly faster. Benchmark results can vary by 10% or more, making most differences undetectable. So all in all this is a good disc and if it doesn't melt tomorrow I plan to keep it for a long time.
Crucial BX500 480GB SATA Internal SSD 💾 with 3D NAND Technology, Up to 540MB/s - CT480BX500SSD1Z
51 Review
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD with 3D NAND, Gen3x4 PCIe M.2 2280, R/W 3500/3000MB/s (ASX8200PNP-1TT-C)
31 Review
SAMSUNG 860 EVO 1TB Internal SSD (MZ-76E1T0E), 2.5-Inch SATA III, 1 TB Capacity
29 Review
Kingston A400 240GB SATA SA400S37/240G solid state drive
60 Review
18 TB External HDD Western Digital WD Elements Desktop, USB 3.0, black
95 Review
Game console Microsoft Xbox One X 1000 GB HDD, black
53 Review
8TB Seagate Backup Plus Hub Desktop Hard Drive with Data Recovery Services
56 Review
Shock-Resistant Transcend StoreJet 25M3 USB 3.1 Slim Portable Hard Drive with 500GB Capacity
99 Review