Review on 16" Notebook Apple MacBook Pro 16 Late 2019 3072x1920, Intel Core i7 2.6 GHz, RAM 16 GB, DDR4, SSD 512 GB, AMD Radeon Pro 5300M, macOS, MVVL2LL/A, silver, English layout by Micha ochowski ᠌

Name: 16" Notebook Apple MacBook Pro 16 Late 2019 3072x1920, Intel Core i7 2.6 GHz, RAM 16 GB, DDR4, SSD 512 GB, AMD Radeon Pro 5300M, macOS, MVVL2LL/A, silver, English layout
Item: 16" Notebook Apple MacBook Pro 16 Late 2019 3072x1920, Intel Core i7 2.6 GHz, RAM 16 GB, DDR4, SSD 512 GB, AMD Radeon Pro 5300M, macOS, MVVL2LL/A, silver, English layout
Rating: 5

May 29, 2023

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

To summarize, this is an excellent portable computer. Even taking into account the expensive cost, I don't see any other options besides him. It's feasible that in one year, they will finish developing the software for the iPad operating system, at which point it will be possible to totally forgo using a laptop in favor of using a tablet. In terms of dependability, it is too soon to judge at this point. Six years of dedicated service were provided by MBP 2022. During this time, the battery was "tired," and there was a wheezing sound coming from the speakers. I have high hopes that the newly released firmware will likewise demonstrate a positive aspect in this way. Best wishes to you!

Pros

The performance is of the highest caliber. It comes in handy while I'm working with After Effects and Final Cut Pro to edit videos. Sufficient for working with 4K content without discomfort. A MacBook Pro from late 2022 equipped with an i7 stood before him. When compared to it, the speed of a new one is subjectively between 50 and 70 percent higher when it is under heavy loads. The sound quality has dramatically improved. More details and volume. Screen bezels are reduced. In contrast to the MBP 2022, when you close the lid there are no visible signs of the keyboard on the actual screen of the device.

Cons

Screen. It's a solid product overall, but when judged against the screen on the iPad Pro 2022, it pales in comparison. In light of the fact that it costs 200 thousand dollars, 120 Hz is shockingly inadequate. The duration of the battery life comes next. 7–10 hours with the typical use of a domestic appliance. On the other hand, the time required to process video typically ranges between three and four hours. Planting can be done in one and a half to two hours if the "heavy" render setting is used. This is the cost of having such high performance. During the process of processing videos, the temperature of the processor rises to an average of 60–70 degrees. It takes about three to four minutes for it to reach 100 on the render. This does not slow down the functioning in any way, but there is a noticeable noise coming from the cooling system, which is responsible for spinning the coolers into the cutoff and draining the battery right in front of our eyes. Everything makes sense, but if you compare it to the ipad pro 2022, you can easily edit 4K footage on a tablet without the device getting warm, which is a significant advantage. The battery will allow for approximately seven to eight hours of continuous mounting. Because of the bugs, there were multiple freezes, which were followed by a reboot, and this went on for a couple of months. Always immediately after ates. It seems to be a problem with the software rather than the laptop itself.